From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>, Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] kernel: unmask SIGSTOP for IO threads
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:59:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/26/21 12:01 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 26.03.21 um 16:29 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>> On 3/26/21 9:23 AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>>> Am 26.03.21 um 16:01 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>>>> On 3/26/21 7:48 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>>> Jens, sorry, I got lost :/
>>>>
>>>> Let's bring you back in :-)
>>>>
>>>>> On 03/25, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With IO threads accepting signals, including SIGSTOP,
>>>>>
>>>>> where can I find this change? Looks like I wasn't cc'ed...
>>>>
>>>> It's this very series.
>>>>
>>>>>> unmask the
>>>>>> SIGSTOP signal from the default blocked mask.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>>>>>> index d3171e8e88e5..d5a40552910f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>>>>>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>>>>>> @@ -2435,7 +2435,7 @@ struct task_struct *create_io_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void *arg, int node)
>>>>>> tsk = copy_process(NULL, 0, node, &args);
>>>>>> if (!IS_ERR(tsk)) {
>>>>>> sigfillset(&tsk->blocked);
>>>>>> - sigdelsetmask(&tsk->blocked, sigmask(SIGKILL));
>>>>>> + sigdelsetmask(&tsk->blocked, sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP));
>>>>>
>>>>> siginitsetinv(blocked, sigmask(SIGKILL)|sigmask(SIGSTOP)) but this is minor.
>>>>
>>>> Ah thanks.
>>>>
>>>>> To remind, either way this is racy and can't really help.
>>>>>
>>>>> And if "IO threads accepting signals" then I don't understand why. Sorry,
>>>>> I must have missed something.
>>>>
>>>> I do think the above is a no-op at this point, and we can probably just
>>>> kill it. Let me double check, hopefully we can just remove this blocked
>>>> part.
>>>
>>> Is this really correct to drop in your "kernel: stop masking signals in create_io_thread()"
>>> commit?
>>>
>>> I don't assume signals wanted by userspace should potentially handled in an io_thread...
>>> e.g. things set with fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG,) used together with F_SETLEASE?
>>
>> I guess we do actually need it, if we're not fiddling with
>> wants_signal() for them. To quell Oleg's concerns, we can just move it
>> to post dup_task_struct(), that should eliminate any race concerns
>> there.
>
> If that one is racy, don' we better also want this one?
> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/438b738c1e4827a7fdfe43087da88bbe17eedc72.1616197787.git.metze@samba.org/T/#u
>
> And clear tsk->pf_io_worker ?
Definitely prudent. I'll get round 2 queued up shortly.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 0:39 [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: handle signals for IO threads like a normal thread Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] kernel: unmask SIGSTOP for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-26 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:23 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 18:01 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 18:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-04-01 14:53 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] Revert "signal: don't allow sending any signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] Revert "kernel: treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for ptrace/signals" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] Revert "kernel: freezer should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for freezing" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] Revert "signal: don't allow STOP on PF_IO_WORKER threads" Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2021-03-26 12:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:31 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:38 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:43 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 14:45 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 14:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:55 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:08 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:10 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:11 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:04 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:09 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-27 1:46 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-27 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-01 14:58 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-04-01 15:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-01 16:00 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-04-01 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-03 0:48 ` Stefan Metzmacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox