public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Usama Arif <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:57:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 2/2/22 8:59 AM, Usama Arif wrote:
> Acquire completion_lock at the start of __io_uring_register before
> registering/unregistering eventfd and release it at the end. Hence
> all calls to io_cqring_ev_posted which adds to the eventfd counter
> will finish before acquiring the spin_lock in io_uring_register, and
> all new calls will wait till the eventfd is registered. This avoids
> ring quiesce which is much more expensive than acquiring the spin_lock.
> 
> On the system tested with this patch, io_uring_reigster with
> IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD takes less than 1ms, compared to 15ms before.

This seems like optimizing for the wrong thing, so I've got a few
questions. Are you doing a lot of eventfd registrations (and unregister)
in your workload? Or is it just the initial pain of registering one? In
talking to Pavel, he suggested that RCU might be a good use case here,
and I think so too. That would still remove the need to quiesce, and the
posted side just needs a fairly cheap rcu read lock/unlock around it.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-02 15:59 [RFC] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-02 16:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-02-02 18:32   ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-02 18:39     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-02 19:18   ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-03 15:14     ` [External] " Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:44       ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-03 15:55         ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox