From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Kees Cook <[email protected]>,
Dan Williams <[email protected]>,
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>, Jan Kara <[email protected]>,
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>,
Chuck Lever <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>,
Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>,
Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>,
Albert Ou <[email protected]>,
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>,
Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>,
Tom Rix <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Replace kmap{,_atomic}() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:38:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Fabio M. De Francesco's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2022 18:35:27 +0200")
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <[email protected]> writes:
> The use of kmap() and kmap_atomic() are being deprecated in favor of
> kmap_local_page().
>
> With kmap_local_page(), the mappings are per thread, CPU local and not
> globally visible. Furthermore, the mappings can be acquired from any
> context (including interrupts).
>
> Therefore, use kmap_local_page() in exec.c because these mappings are per
> thread, CPU local, and not globally visible.
>
> Tested with xfstests on a QEMU + KVM 32-bits VM booting a kernel with
> HIGHMEM64GB enabled.
Can someone please refresh my memory on what is going on.
I remember there were limitations that kmap_atomic had that are hard to
meet so something I think it was kmap_local was invented and created
to be the kmap_atomic replacement.
What are the requirements on kmap_local? In copy_strings
kmap is called in contexts that can sleep in page faults so any
nearly any requirement except a thread local use is invalidated.
As you have described kmap_local above it does not sound like kmap_local
is safe in this context, but that could just be a problem in description
that my poor memory does is not recalling the necessary details to
correct.
Eric
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/exec.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 0989fb8472a1..4a2129c0d422 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -583,11 +583,11 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, struct user_arg_ptr argv,
>
> if (kmapped_page) {
> flush_dcache_page(kmapped_page);
> - kunmap(kmapped_page);
> + kunmap_local(kaddr);
> put_arg_page(kmapped_page);
> }
> kmapped_page = page;
> - kaddr = kmap(kmapped_page);
> + kaddr = kmap_local_page(kmapped_page);
> kpos = pos & PAGE_MASK;
> flush_arg_page(bprm, kpos, kmapped_page);
> }
> @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, struct user_arg_ptr argv,
> out:
> if (kmapped_page) {
> flush_dcache_page(kmapped_page);
> - kunmap(kmapped_page);
> + kunmap_local(kaddr);
> put_arg_page(kmapped_page);
> }
> return ret;
> @@ -883,11 +883,11 @@ int transfer_args_to_stack(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>
> for (index = MAX_ARG_PAGES - 1; index >= stop; index--) {
> unsigned int offset = index == stop ? bprm->p & ~PAGE_MASK : 0;
> - char *src = kmap(bprm->page[index]) + offset;
> + char *src = kmap_local_page(bprm->page[index]) + offset;
> sp -= PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> if (copy_to_user((void *) sp, src, PAGE_SIZE - offset) != 0)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> - kunmap(bprm->page[index]);
> + kunmap_local(src);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1680,13 +1680,13 @@ int remove_arg_zero(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> goto out;
> }
> - kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> + kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
>
> for (; offset < PAGE_SIZE && kaddr[offset];
> offset++, bprm->p++)
> ;
>
> - kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> + kunmap_local(kaddr);
> put_arg_page(page);
> } while (offset == PAGE_SIZE);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 16:35 [PATCH] fs: Replace kmap{,_atomic}() with kmap_local_page() Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-06-30 17:38 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2022-07-01 10:10 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-07-08 20:18 ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-09 18:30 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox