From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A44A212B73 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2025 22:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757282652; cv=none; b=fRE8u1nC3paJhTL17M6nFz2teKwgcNuurNyZWinKWFYCLVllrYbENVFa4cddueyiP29kKuI1BnPIfy7vdZn7DSJtW00GMGDjzNFZ+Q48+CmwkJnAIS9Eejf4C+APoJJepjQna5ePoVhEaXwo5Z51p/tl/TQAWJM5LyC8O1hemGY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757282652; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MuvNavY7rqb26WNG55L9Yfqn0nKcVjYYA9VZhE65y2I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kI8Vngf2sRrkOsDLuTS/kNtU8HGEAjKRZgjT78eO17g9VK6I97FtSekeb/olRRZkubI4+PwHqsu1uXeataDtu8R8+b9GYtjAQZebAIqE2o0maZCtypALAsUv6XYmp1D6HV2bGRFg0njkkVSs5pQyxhcxeK6K74xg8+PPWc/FQvI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=jL2vQz6j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="jL2vQz6j" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 652AA40AE2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1757282649; bh=629pRZZlUS4PjmwA4SGvzJAuJYTTNjZObLmPT1vhkio=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jL2vQz6jjR7PH2V/1rZup6Ly3jzCYGkFQqi8ESKVLWxTqthku4MrZImgMvz2wiSSI 7kRikpJnqlp+oMYPABDAVirc98xmcuUN7pZXQ2D5VrnvQ4EW68/Dur5jXnBCW3JHzg uVURQ5+OhNqUGtKGWQ9inM3AAmZr6c+Ss9PRN6GD7eaYhb3C95bXXc9py6Fm5iZdLZ BwhxMNgVHe1jVULFrLijxMQQGm1qZUqOSRa/cvYfEqpy2YhaNCEfqEG2/u7Qlo53pu Fv0JXz6y+ZudKnS5T5iujq4nClI0J7xSGMkK44sDiHvNikRA9QBsjDTbS7AKP91HAd ik2fWOik202Lw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 652AA40AE2; Sun, 7 Sep 2025 22:04:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Konstantin Ryabitsev , Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , Caleb Sander Mateos , io-uring Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring fix for 6.17-rc5 In-Reply-To: <20250905-lovely-prehistoric-goldfish-04e1c3@lemur> References: <9ef87524-d15c-4b2c-9f86-00417dad9c48@kernel.dk> <20250905-lovely-prehistoric-goldfish-04e1c3@lemur> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2025 16:04:08 -0600 Message-ID: <87a535zzqf.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Konstantin Ryabitsev writes: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 10:24:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Yes, I'm grumpy. I feel like my main job - really my only job - is to >> try to make sense of pull requests, and that's why I absolutely detest >> these things that are automatically added and only make my job harder. >> >> I'm cc'ing Konstantin again, because this is a prime example of why >> that automation HURTS, and he was arguing in favor of that sh*t just >> last week. >> >> Can we please stop this automated idiocy? > > FWIW, Link: trailers are not added by default. The maintainer has to > deliberately add the -l switch. It's worth noting that our documentation suggests adding a Git hook to add Link: tags automatically: Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst. I suspect a lot of people add such hooks years ago when it was all the rage and have long since forgotten about them... Not that I would be such a person, of course. It seems we should remove the recommendation? jon