From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
To: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Harris James R <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
ZiyangZhang <[email protected]>,
Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] ublk: add io_uring based userspace block driver
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:13:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Sagi Grimberg's message of "Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:00:10 +0300")
Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]> writes:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>>>> index fdb81f2794cd..d218089cdbec 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -408,6 +408,12 @@ config BLK_DEV_RBD
>>>> If unsure, say N.
>>>> +config BLK_DEV_UBLK
>>>> + bool "Userspace block driver"
>>>
>>> Really? why compile this to the kernel and not tristate as loadable
>>> module?
>> So far, this is only one reason: task_work_add() is required, which
>> isn't exported for modules.
>
> So why not exporting it?
> Doesn't seem like a good justification to build it into the kernel.
Sagi,
If I understand correctly, the task_work_add function is quite a core
API that we probably want to avoid exposing directly to (out-of-tree)
modules? I agree, though, it would be great to have this buildable as a
module for general use cases. Would it make sense to have it exposed
through a thin built-in wrapper, specific to UBD, which is exported, and
therefore able to invoke that function? Is it a reasonable approach?
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 16:08 [PATCH V3 0/1] ublk: add io_uring based userspace block driver Ming Lei
2022-06-28 16:08 ` [PATCH V3 1/1] " Ming Lei
2022-06-30 11:35 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-06-30 12:33 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-01 2:47 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-07-01 4:06 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-04 11:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-04 12:34 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-04 14:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-04 16:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2022-07-04 16:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-05 0:43 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-04 22:10 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-07-05 4:16 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-07-05 8:12 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-05 8:06 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-07 7:49 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-07 7:58 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox