From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:08:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Jens Axboe's message of "Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:17:35 -0700")
Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:
> - TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, %s queue, work %p",
> + TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%lx, %s queue, work %p",
> __entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
> - __get_str(op_str),
> - __entry->flags, __entry->rw ? "hashed" : "normal", __entry->work)
> + __get_str(op_str), (long) __entry->flags,
Hi Jens,
Minor, but on 32-bit kernel the cast is wrong since
sizeof(long)==4. Afaik, io_uring still builds on 32-bit archs.
If you use (unsigned long long), it will be 64 bit anywhere.
> + __entry->rw ? "hashed" : "normal", __entry->work)
> );
>
> /**
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_req,
> __field( void *, req )
> __field( unsigned long long, user_data )
> __field( u8, opcode )
> - __field( u32, flags )
> + __field( io_req_flags_t, flags )
> __field( bool, sq_thread )
>
> __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode) )
> @@ -395,10 +395,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_req,
> __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(req->opcode));
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, "
> + TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%lx, "
> "sq_thread %d", __entry->ctx, __entry->req,
> __entry->user_data, __get_str(op_str),
> - __entry->flags, __entry->sq_thread)
> + (long) __entry->flags, __entry->sq_thread)
likewise.
> );
>
> /*
> diff --git a/io_uring/filetable.h b/io_uring/filetable.h
> index b47adf170c31..b2435c4dca1f 100644
> --- a/io_uring/filetable.h
> +++ b/io_uring/filetable.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int io_fixed_fd_remove(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int offset);
> int io_register_file_alloc_range(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> struct io_uring_file_index_range __user *arg);
>
> -unsigned int io_file_get_flags(struct file *file);
> +io_req_flags_t io_file_get_flags(struct file *file);
>
> static inline void io_file_bitmap_clear(struct io_file_table *table, int bit)
> {
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index cd9a137ad6ce..b8ca907b77eb 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -1768,9 +1768,9 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> }
> }
>
> -unsigned int io_file_get_flags(struct file *file)
> +io_req_flags_t io_file_get_flags(struct file *file)
> {
> - unsigned int res = 0;
> + io_req_flags_t res = 0;
>
> if (S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode))
> res |= REQ_F_ISREG;
> @@ -2171,7 +2171,8 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
> /* req is partially pre-initialised, see io_preinit_req() */
> req->opcode = opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
> /* same numerical values with corresponding REQ_F_*, safe to copy */
> - req->flags = sqe_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->flags);
> + sqe_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->flags);
Did you consider that READ_ONCE won't protect from load tearing the
userspace value in 32-bit architectures? It builds silently, though, and
I suspect it is mostly fine in the current code, but might become a bug
eventually.
Thanks,
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 17:17 [PATCHSET v2 0/6] Misc cleanups / optimizations Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits Jens Axboe
2024-02-08 20:08 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2024-02-08 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-08 20:52 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] io_uring/cancel: don't default to setting req->work.cancel_seq Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] io_uring: add io_file_can_poll() helper Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] io_uring: mark the need to lock/unlock the ring as unlikely Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: cleanup io_req_complete_post() Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] io_uring/rw: remove dead file == NULL check Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-06 16:22 [PATCHSET next 0/6] Misc cleanups / optimizations Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 22:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 0:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-02-07 2:18 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 3:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox