public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:37:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fcae79-674c-4eea-8e65-4763c6fced44@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411-teebeutel-begibt-7d9c0323954b@brauner>

On 4/11/25 7:48 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Seems fine. Although it has some potential for abuse. So maybe a
> VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE() that PF_NO_TASKWORK is only used with PF_KTHREAD
> would make sense.

Can certainly add that. You'd want that before the check for
in_interrupt and PF_NO_TASKWORK? Something ala

	/* PF_NO_TASKWORK should only be used with PF_KTHREAD */
	VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE((task->flags & PF_NO_TASKWORK) && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD));

?

> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 13:35 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Cancel and wait for all requests on exit Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK Jens Axboe
2025-04-11 13:48   ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-11 14:37     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-04-14 10:10       ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-14 14:29         ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 17:11   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-04-14 19:35     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: mark exit side kworkers as task_work capable Jens Axboe
2025-04-11 13:55   ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-11 14:38     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: consider ring dead once the ref is marked dying Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: wait for cancelations on final ring put Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: switch away from percpu refcounts Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-21 19:24 [PATCHSET RFC v2 0/5] Cancel and wait for all requests on exit Jens Axboe
2025-03-21 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK Jens Axboe
2024-06-04 19:01 [PATCHSET RFC 0/5] Wait on cancelations at release time Jens Axboe
2024-06-04 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fcae79-674c-4eea-8e65-4763c6fced44@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox