From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 14:14:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h61vrmu7.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508181203.3785544-1-krisman@suse.de> (Gabriel Krisman Bertazi's message of "Thu, 8 May 2025 14:12:03 -0400")
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de> writes:
> Our QA team reported a 10%-23%, throughput reduction on an io_uring
> sqpoll testcase doing IO to a null_blk, that I traced back to a
> reduction of the device submission queue depth utilization. It turns out
> that, after commit af5d68f8892f ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work
> privately"), we capped the number of task_work entries that can be
> completed from a single spin of sqpoll to only 8 entries, before the
> sqpoll goes around to (potentially) sleep. While this cap doesn't drive
> the submission side directly, it impacts the completion behavior, which
> affects the number of IO queued by fio per sqpoll cycle on the
> submission side, and io_uring ends up seeing less ios per sqpoll cycle.
> As a result, block layer plugging is less effective, and we see more
> time spent inside the block layer in profilings charts, and increased
> submission latency measured by fio.
Uh, this should have been tagged as v2. The original submission and
some discussion available at:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/94da2142-d7c1-46bb-bc35-05d0d1c28182@kernel.dk/
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 18:12 [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-05-08 18:14 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2025-05-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-03 19:56 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-04 1:18 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-07 15:47 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h61vrmu7.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be \
--to=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox