From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6889C4708F for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2576140F for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229982AbhFDJVe (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 05:21:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36252 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229930AbhFDJVe (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 05:21:34 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5D2C06174A; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:19:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1622798386; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UtZCCmwycy6zhYy7Z1u7SlZ7V50PFpLJ9AuA4SdG6YE=; b=mnPcHI5f3lYt7eODmN54Nt743KJtMe51b501m9QbBMqcMZYBho3qajnRrtQEaqPUReZBt2 xPKz/XGzbccE5J2VN4EMCpurJ64sdaD750lVduPCnBn8fP/4GZz+TRM330Ff2IPXGAw349 qjtdDqwb9cloJ/CNfLl7bd4ljMfGvEEeQlr6VPl3bQb24tI5wmUCJ6/Zx4X82qvjvHBSXh LxTQtdt9j3ZQBJEvcPsu40O62UHadFPTGzKQU/VDMz+ws0q1oXcxDWmgY65eiFM+MxhlHU M7aBBjXDEo0p+rLtn07og/qHjteGdzm4P07yqL/8seqLOnNWheqO0oIikDnk0A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1622798386; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UtZCCmwycy6zhYy7Z1u7SlZ7V50PFpLJ9AuA4SdG6YE=; b=IzwhihPN78AE84ioOW2GQN4zHDHoe6x4yK3rHEd3XfITdUz8MbGRnZYJHf/v6ffgBAidxP jR997ibukS3AzmAg== To: Pavel Begunkov , Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andres Freund , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait In-Reply-To: <30bdf12c-6287-4c13-920c-bb5cc6ac02bf@gmail.com> References: <409a624c-de75-0ee5-b65f-ee09fff34809@gmail.com> <5ab4c8bd-3e82-e87b-1ae8-3b32ced72009@gmail.com> <87sg211ccj.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <30bdf12c-6287-4c13-920c-bb5cc6ac02bf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:19:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0nayojy.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Pavel, On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 11:31, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 6/1/21 10:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> 1) The proposed solution: I can't figure out from the changelogs or the >> cover letter what kind of problems it solves and what the exact >> semantics are. If you ever consider to submit futex patches, may I >> recommend to study Documentation/process and get some inspiration >> from git-log? > > I'm sorry you're incapable of grasping ideas quick, but may we > stop this stupid galling and switch to a more productive way of > speaking? which you just achieved by telling me I'm too stupid to understand your brilliant idea. Great start for a productive discussion. Try again. Thanks, tglx