public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
To: Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>,  Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	 [email protected], [email protected],
	 Joanne Koong <[email protected]>,
	 Josef Bacik <[email protected]>,
	 Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>,
	 Ming Lei <[email protected]>,  David Wei <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/17] fuse: Add io-uring sqe commit and fetch support
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:42:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Bernd Schubert's message of "Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:25:15 +0100")

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 07 2025, Bernd Schubert wrote:

> This adds support for fuse request completion through ring SQEs
> (FUSE_URING_CMD_COMMIT_AND_FETCH handling). After committing
> the ring entry it becomes available for new fuse requests.
> Handling of requests through the ring (SQE/CQE handling)
> is complete now.
>
> Fuse request data are copied through the mmaped ring buffer,
> there is no support for any zero copy yet.

Please find below a few more comments.

Also, please note that I'm trying to understand this patchset (and the
whole fuse-over-io-uring thing), so most of my comments are minor nits.
And those that are not may simply be wrong!  I'm just noting them as I
navigate through the code.

(And by the way, thanks for this work!)

> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dev_uring.c   | 450 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h |  12 ++
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h      |   4 +
>  3 files changed, 466 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> index b44ba4033615e01041313c040035b6da6af0ee17..f44e66a7ea577390da87e9ac7d118a9416898c28 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,19 @@ bool fuse_uring_enabled(void)
>  	return enable_uring;
>  }
>  
> +static void fuse_uring_req_end(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent, bool set_err,
> +			       int error)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_req *req = ring_ent->fuse_req;
> +
> +	if (set_err)
> +		req->out.h.error = error;
> +
> +	clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
> +	fuse_request_end(ring_ent->fuse_req);
> +	ring_ent->fuse_req = NULL;
> +}
> +
>  void fuse_uring_destruct(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  {
>  	struct fuse_ring *ring = fc->ring;
> @@ -41,8 +54,11 @@ void fuse_uring_destruct(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&queue->ent_avail_queue));
> +		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&queue->ent_w_req_queue));
>  		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&queue->ent_commit_queue));
> +		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&queue->ent_in_userspace));
>  
> +		kfree(queue->fpq.processing);
>  		kfree(queue);
>  		ring->queues[qid] = NULL;
>  	}
> @@ -101,20 +117,34 @@ static struct fuse_ring_queue *fuse_uring_create_queue(struct fuse_ring *ring,
>  {
>  	struct fuse_conn *fc = ring->fc;
>  	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue;
> +	struct list_head *pq;
>  
>  	queue = kzalloc(sizeof(*queue), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>  	if (!queue)
>  		return NULL;
> +	pq = kcalloc(FUSE_PQ_HASH_SIZE, sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pq) {
> +		kfree(queue);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	queue->qid = qid;
>  	queue->ring = ring;
>  	spin_lock_init(&queue->lock);
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->ent_avail_queue);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->ent_commit_queue);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->ent_w_req_queue);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->ent_in_userspace);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->fuse_req_queue);
> +
> +	queue->fpq.processing = pq;
> +	fuse_pqueue_init(&queue->fpq);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&fc->lock);
>  	if (ring->queues[qid]) {
>  		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +		kfree(queue->fpq.processing);
>  		kfree(queue);
>  		return ring->queues[qid];
>  	}
> @@ -128,6 +158,214 @@ static struct fuse_ring_queue *fuse_uring_create_queue(struct fuse_ring *ring,
>  	return queue;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Checks for errors and stores it into the request
> + */
> +static int fuse_uring_out_header_has_err(struct fuse_out_header *oh,
> +					 struct fuse_req *req,
> +					 struct fuse_conn *fc)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = -EINVAL;
> +	if (oh->unique == 0) {
> +		/* Not supportd through io-uring yet */

typo: "supported"

> +		pr_warn_once("notify through fuse-io-uring not supported\n");
> +		goto seterr;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = -EINVAL;

Not really needed, it already has this value.

> +	if (oh->error <= -ERESTARTSYS || oh->error > 0)
> +		goto seterr;
> +
> +	if (oh->error) {
> +		err = oh->error;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = -ENOENT;
> +	if ((oh->unique & ~FUSE_INT_REQ_BIT) != req->in.h.unique) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("unique mismatch, expected: %llu got %llu\n",
> +				    req->in.h.unique,
> +				    oh->unique & ~FUSE_INT_REQ_BIT);
> +		goto seterr;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Is it an interrupt reply ID?
> +	 * XXX: Not supported through fuse-io-uring yet, it should not even
> +	 *      find the request - should not happen.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(oh->unique & FUSE_INT_REQ_BIT);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +seterr:
> +	oh->error = err;
> +err:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int fuse_uring_copy_from_ring(struct fuse_ring *ring,
> +				     struct fuse_req *req,
> +				     struct fuse_ring_ent *ent)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_copy_state cs;
> +	struct fuse_args *args = req->args;
> +	struct iov_iter iter;
> +	int err, res;

nit: no need for two variables; one of the 'int' variables could be
removed.  There are other functions with a similar pattern, but this was
the first one that caught my attention.

> +	struct fuse_uring_ent_in_out ring_in_out;
> +
> +	res = copy_from_user(&ring_in_out, &ent->headers->ring_ent_in_out,
> +			     sizeof(ring_in_out));
> +	if (res)
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	err = import_ubuf(ITER_SOURCE, ent->payload, ring->max_payload_sz,
> +			  &iter);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	fuse_copy_init(&cs, 0, &iter);
> +	cs.is_uring = 1;
> +	cs.req = req;
> +
> +	return fuse_copy_out_args(&cs, args, ring_in_out.payload_sz);
> +}
> +
> + /*
> +  * Copy data from the req to the ring buffer
> +  */

nit: extra space in comment indentation.

> 
> +static int fuse_uring_copy_to_ring(struct fuse_ring *ring, struct fuse_req *req,
> +				   struct fuse_ring_ent *ent)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_copy_state cs;
> +	struct fuse_args *args = req->args;
> +	struct fuse_in_arg *in_args = args->in_args;
> +	int num_args = args->in_numargs;
> +	int err, res;
> +	struct iov_iter iter;
> +	struct fuse_uring_ent_in_out ent_in_out = {
> +		.flags = 0,
> +		.commit_id = ent->commit_id,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(ent_in_out.commit_id == 0))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	err = import_ubuf(ITER_DEST, ent->payload, ring->max_payload_sz, &iter);
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_info_ratelimited("fuse: Import of user buffer failed\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	fuse_copy_init(&cs, 1, &iter);
> +	cs.is_uring = 1;
> +	cs.req = req;
> +
> +	if (num_args > 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Expectation is that the first argument is the per op header.
> +		 * Some op code have that as zero.
> +		 */
> +		if (args->in_args[0].size > 0) {
> +			res = copy_to_user(&ent->headers->op_in, in_args->value,
> +					   in_args->size);
> +			err = res > 0 ? -EFAULT : res;
> +			if (err) {
> +				pr_info_ratelimited(
> +					"Copying the header failed.\n");
> +				return err;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		in_args++;
> +		num_args--;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* copy the payload */
> +	err = fuse_copy_args(&cs, num_args, args->in_pages,
> +			     (struct fuse_arg *)in_args, 0);
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_info_ratelimited("%s fuse_copy_args failed\n", __func__);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ent_in_out.payload_sz = cs.ring.copied_sz;
> +	res = copy_to_user(&ent->headers->ring_ent_in_out, &ent_in_out,
> +			   sizeof(ent_in_out));
> +	err = res > 0 ? -EFAULT : res;
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;

Simply return err? :-)

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +fuse_uring_prepare_send(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
> +	struct fuse_ring *ring = queue->ring;
> +	struct fuse_req *req = ring_ent->fuse_req;
> +	int err, res;
> +
> +	err = -EIO;
> +	if (WARN_ON(ring_ent->state != FRRS_FUSE_REQ)) {
> +		pr_err("qid=%d ring-req=%p invalid state %d on send\n",
> +		       queue->qid, ring_ent, ring_ent->state);
> +		err = -EIO;

'err' initialized twice.  One of these could be removed.

> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* copy the request */
> +	err = fuse_uring_copy_to_ring(ring, req, ring_ent);
> +	if (unlikely(err)) {
> +		pr_info_ratelimited("Copy to ring failed: %d\n", err);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* copy fuse_in_header */
> +	res = copy_to_user(&ring_ent->headers->in_out, &req->in.h,
> +			   sizeof(req->in.h));
> +	err = res > 0 ? -EFAULT : res;
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	set_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	fuse_uring_req_end(ring_ent, true, err);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Write data to the ring buffer and send the request to userspace,
> + * userspace will read it
> + * This is comparable with classical read(/dev/fuse)
> + */
> +static int fuse_uring_send_next_to_ring(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
> +					unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
> +
> +	err = fuse_uring_prepare_send(ring_ent);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err;

Since this is the only place where this label is used, it could simply
return 'err' and the label removed.

> +
> +	spin_lock(&queue->lock);
> +	ring_ent->state = FRRS_USERSPACE;
> +	list_move(&ring_ent->list, &queue->ent_in_userspace);
> +	spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	io_uring_cmd_done(ring_ent->cmd, 0, 0, issue_flags);
> +	ring_ent->cmd = NULL;
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Make a ring entry available for fuse_req assignment
>   */
> @@ -138,6 +376,210 @@ static void fuse_uring_ent_avail(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
>  	ring_ent->state = FRRS_AVAILABLE;
>  }
>  
> +/* Used to find the request on SQE commit */
> +static void fuse_uring_add_to_pq(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
> +				 struct fuse_req *req)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
> +	struct fuse_pqueue *fpq = &queue->fpq;
> +	unsigned int hash;
> +
> +	/* commit_id is the unique id of the request */
> +	ring_ent->commit_id = req->in.h.unique;
> +
> +	req->ring_entry = ring_ent;
> +	hash = fuse_req_hash(ring_ent->commit_id);
> +	list_move_tail(&req->list, &fpq->processing[hash]);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Assign a fuse queue entry to the given entry
> + */
> +static void fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
> +					   struct fuse_req *req)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ring_ent->state != FRRS_AVAILABLE &&
> +			 ring_ent->state != FRRS_COMMIT)) {
> +		pr_warn("%s qid=%d state=%d\n", __func__, ring_ent->queue->qid,
> +			ring_ent->state);
> +	}
> +	list_del_init(&req->list);
> +	clear_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
> +	ring_ent->fuse_req = req;
> +	ring_ent->state = FRRS_FUSE_REQ;
> +	list_move(&ring_ent->list, &queue->ent_w_req_queue);
> +	fuse_uring_add_to_pq(ring_ent, req);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Release the ring entry and fetch the next fuse request if available
> + *
> + * @return true if a new request has been fetched
> + */
> +static bool fuse_uring_ent_assign_req(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent)
> +	__must_hold(&queue->lock)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_req *req;
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
> +	struct list_head *req_queue = &queue->fuse_req_queue;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	/* get and assign the next entry while it is still holding the lock */
> +	req = list_first_entry_or_null(req_queue, struct fuse_req, list);
> +	if (req) {
> +		fuse_uring_add_req_to_ring_ent(ring_ent, req);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Read data from the ring buffer, which user space has written to
> + * This is comparible with handling of classical write(/dev/fuse).

nit: "comparable"

> + * Also make the ring request available again for new fuse requests.
> + */
> +static void fuse_uring_commit(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
> +			      unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_ring *ring = ring_ent->queue->ring;
> +	struct fuse_conn *fc = ring->fc;
> +	struct fuse_req *req = ring_ent->fuse_req;
> +	ssize_t err = 0;
> +	bool set_err = false;
> +
> +	err = copy_from_user(&req->out.h, &ring_ent->headers->in_out,
> +			     sizeof(req->out.h));
> +	if (err) {
> +		req->out.h.error = err;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = fuse_uring_out_header_has_err(&req->out.h, req, fc);
> +	if (err) {
> +		/* req->out.h.error already set */
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = fuse_uring_copy_from_ring(ring, req, ring_ent);
> +	if (err)
> +		set_err = true;
> +
> +out:
> +	fuse_uring_req_end(ring_ent, set_err, err);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the next fuse req and send it
> + */
> +static void fuse_uring_next_fuse_req(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
> +				     struct fuse_ring_queue *queue,
> +				     unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	bool has_next;
> +
> +retry:
> +	spin_lock(&queue->lock);
> +	fuse_uring_ent_avail(ring_ent, queue);
> +	has_next = fuse_uring_ent_assign_req(ring_ent);
> +	spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	if (has_next) {
> +		err = fuse_uring_send_next_to_ring(ring_ent, issue_flags);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto retry;

I wonder whether this is safe.  Maybe this is *obviously* safe, but I'm
still trying to understand this patchset; so, for me, it is not :-)

Would it be worth it trying to limit the maximum number of retries?

> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int fuse_ring_ent_set_commit(struct fuse_ring_ent *ent)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ent->queue;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ent->state != FRRS_USERSPACE))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	ent->state = FRRS_COMMIT;
> +	list_move(&ent->list, &queue->ent_commit_queue);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* FUSE_URING_CMD_COMMIT_AND_FETCH handler */
> +static int fuse_uring_commit_fetch(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, int issue_flags,
> +				   struct fuse_conn *fc)
> +{
> +	const struct fuse_uring_cmd_req *cmd_req = io_uring_sqe_cmd(cmd->sqe);
> +	struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent;
> +	int err;
> +	struct fuse_ring *ring = fc->ring;
> +	struct fuse_ring_queue *queue;
> +	uint64_t commit_id = READ_ONCE(cmd_req->commit_id);
> +	unsigned int qid = READ_ONCE(cmd_req->qid);
> +	struct fuse_pqueue *fpq;
> +	struct fuse_req *req;
> +
> +	err = -ENOTCONN;
> +	if (!ring)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	if (qid >= ring->nr_queues)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	queue = ring->queues[qid];
> +	if (!queue)
> +		return err;
> +	fpq = &queue->fpq;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&queue->lock);
> +	/* Find a request based on the unique ID of the fuse request
> +	 * This should get revised, as it needs a hash calculation and list
> +	 * search. And full struct fuse_pqueue is needed (memory overhead).
> +	 * As well as the link from req to ring_ent.
> +	 */
> +	req = fuse_request_find(fpq, commit_id);
> +	err = -ENOENT;
> +	if (!req) {
> +		pr_info("qid=%d commit_id %llu not found\n", queue->qid,
> +			commit_id);
> +		spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	list_del_init(&req->list);
> +	ring_ent = req->ring_entry;
> +	req->ring_entry = NULL;
> +
> +	err = fuse_ring_ent_set_commit(ring_ent);
> +	if (err != 0) {

I'm probably missing something, but because we removed 'req' from the list
above, aren't we leaking it if we get an error here?

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

> +		pr_info_ratelimited("qid=%d commit_id %llu state %d",
> +				    queue->qid, commit_id, ring_ent->state);
> +		spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ring_ent->cmd = cmd;
> +	spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	/* without the queue lock, as other locks are taken */
> +	fuse_uring_commit(ring_ent, issue_flags);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Fetching the next request is absolutely required as queued
> +	 * fuse requests would otherwise not get processed - committing
> +	 * and fetching is done in one step vs legacy fuse, which has separated
> +	 * read (fetch request) and write (commit result).
> +	 */
> +	fuse_uring_next_fuse_req(ring_ent, queue, issue_flags);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * fuse_uring_req_fetch command handling
>   */
> @@ -325,6 +767,14 @@ int __maybe_unused fuse_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  		break;
> +	case FUSE_IO_URING_CMD_COMMIT_AND_FETCH:
> +		err = fuse_uring_commit_fetch(cmd, issue_flags, fc);
> +		if (err) {
> +			pr_info_once("FUSE_IO_URING_COMMIT_AND_FETCH failed err=%d\n",
> +				     err);
> +			return err;
> +		}
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h b/fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h
> index 4e46dd65196d26dabc62dada33b17de9aa511c08..80f1c62d4df7f0ca77c4d5179068df6ffdbf7d85 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ enum fuse_ring_req_state {
>  	/* The ring entry is waiting for new fuse requests */
>  	FRRS_AVAILABLE,
>  
> +	/* The ring entry got assigned a fuse req */
> +	FRRS_FUSE_REQ,
> +
>  	/* The ring entry is in or on the way to user space */
>  	FRRS_USERSPACE,
>  };
> @@ -70,7 +73,16 @@ struct fuse_ring_queue {
>  	 * entries in the process of being committed or in the process
>  	 * to be sent to userspace
>  	 */
> +	struct list_head ent_w_req_queue;
>  	struct list_head ent_commit_queue;
> +
> +	/* entries in userspace */
> +	struct list_head ent_in_userspace;
> +
> +	/* fuse requests waiting for an entry slot */
> +	struct list_head fuse_req_queue;
> +
> +	struct fuse_pqueue fpq;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index e545b0864dd51e82df61cc39bdf65d3d36a418dc..e71556894bc25808581424ec7bdd4afeebc81f15 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -438,6 +438,10 @@ struct fuse_req {
>  
>  	/** fuse_mount this request belongs to */
>  	struct fuse_mount *fm;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUSE_IO_URING
> +	void *ring_entry;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  struct fuse_iqueue;
>
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07  0:25 [PATCH v9 00/17] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] fuse: rename to fuse_dev_end_requests and make non-static Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] fuse: Move fuse_get_dev to header file Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] fuse: Move request bits Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] fuse: Add fuse-io-uring design documentation Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] fuse: make args->in_args[0] to be always the header Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  9:56   ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-07 12:07     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 11:06   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-19 22:47     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] fuse: Make fuse_copy non static Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] fuse: Add fuse-io-uring handling into fuse_copy Bernd Schubert
2025-01-10 22:18   ` Joanne Koong
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] fuse: {io-uring} Make hash-list req unique finding functions non-static Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] fuse: Add io-uring sqe commit and fetch support Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 14:42   ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2025-01-07 15:59     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 16:21       ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-13 22:44   ` Joanne Koong
2025-01-20  0:33     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 11:18   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-17 11:20     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] fuse: {io-uring} Handle teardown of ring entries Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 15:31   ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-17 11:23   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] fuse: {io-uring} Make fuse_dev_queue_{interrupt,forget} non-static Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] fuse: Allow to queue fg requests through io-uring Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 15:54   ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-07 18:59     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 21:25       ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-17 11:47   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-17 21:52   ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] fuse: Allow to queue bg " Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 11:49   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] fuse: {io-uring} Prevent mount point hang on fuse-server termination Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07 16:14   ` Luis Henriques
2025-01-07 19:03     ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 11:52   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] fuse: block request allocation until io-uring init is complete Bernd Schubert
2025-01-07  0:25 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] fuse: enable fuse-over-io-uring Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 11:52   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-17  9:07 ` [PATCH v9 00/17] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring Miklos Szeredi
2025-01-17  9:12   ` Bernd Schubert
2025-01-17 12:01     ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox