public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <[email protected]>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/19] io_uring: convert to use vm_account
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:12:43 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8/[email protected]>


Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:42:38PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> Convert io_uring to use vm_account instead of directly charging pages
>> against the user/mm. Rather than charge pages to both user->locked_vm
>> and mm->pinned_vm this will only charge pages to user->locked_vm.
>
> I think this is a mistake in the first patch, the pinned_vm should
> still increment (but not checked against the rlimit), though its main
> purpose in this mode is for debugging in proc.

Sorry, didn't quite follow - are you saying we should always increment
mm->pinned_vm and only use VM_ACCOUNT_USER vs. TASK to select which one
the rlimit is enforced against?

> Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.f52b9eb2792bccb8a9ecd6bc95055705cfe2ae03.1674538665.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com>
2023-01-24  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] mm: Introduce vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-24 14:32   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:36     ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-31 14:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-24  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] io_uring: convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:12     ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2023-01-30 13:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox