From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rw: always clear ->bytes_done on io_async_rw setup
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:08:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Jens Axboe's message of "Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:53:43 -0700")
Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:
> A previous commit mistakenly moved the clearing of the in-progress byte
> count into the section that's dependent on having a cached iovec or not,
> but it should be cleared for any IO. If not, then extra bytes may be
> added at IO completion time, causing potentially weird behavior like
> over-reporting the amount of IO done.
Hi Jens,
Sorry for the delay. I went completely offline during the christmas
week.
Did this solve the sysbot report? I'm failing to understand how it can
happen. This could only be hit if the allocation returned a cached
object that doesn't have a free_iov, since any newly kmalloc'ed object
will have this field cleaned inside the io_rw_async_data_init callback.
But I don't understand where we can cache the rw object without having a
valid free_iov - it didn't seem possible to me before or now.
the iov is freed only by io_rw_iovec_free, which is called from
(1) io_rw_recycle, in the case where we don't cache. we drop also
drop the CLEANUP flag, so we will just call kfree inside io_clean_op later.
(2) io_readv_writev_cleanup: where we also don't cache, since we are inside
the io_clean_op, we'll just hit the kfree(req->async_data), and
(3) io_rw_cache_free: where we are emptying the cache to shut down.
> diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
> index 75f70935ccf4..ca1b19d3d142 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rw.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rw.c
> @@ -228,8 +228,8 @@ static int io_rw_alloc_async(struct io_kiocb *req)
> kasan_mempool_unpoison_object(rw->free_iovec,
> rw->free_iov_nr * sizeof(struct iovec));
> req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
> - rw->bytes_done = 0;
> }
> + rw->bytes_done = 0;
> return 0;
> }
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-30 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-27 16:53 [PATCH] io_uring/rw: always clear ->bytes_done on io_async_rw setup Jens Axboe
2024-12-30 16:08 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2024-12-30 16:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-12-30 23:02 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-12-31 0:13 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox