From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] io_uring: optimise deferred tw execution
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:46:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8839534891f0a2f1076e78554a31ea7e099f7de5.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
We needed fake nodes in __io_run_local_work() and to avoid unecessary wake
ups while the task already running task_works, but we don't need them
anymore since wake ups are protected by cq_waiting, which is always
cleared by the time we're executing deferred task_work items.
Note that because of loose sync around cq_waiting clearing
io_req_local_work_add() may wake the task more than once, but that's
fine and should be rare to not hurt perf.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 9c95ceb1a9f2..1dd0fc0412c8 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1322,17 +1322,16 @@ static void __cold io_move_task_work_from_local(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)
{
struct llist_node *node;
- struct llist_node fake;
- struct llist_node *current_final = NULL;
+ unsigned int loops = 0;
int ret = 0;
- unsigned int loops = 1;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->submitter_task != current))
return -EEXIST;
-
- node = io_llist_xchg(&ctx->work_llist, &fake);
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG)
+ atomic_andnot(IORING_SQ_TASKRUN, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
again:
- while (node != current_final) {
+ node = io_llist_xchg(&ctx->work_llist, NULL);
+ while (node) {
struct llist_node *next = node->next;
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
io_task_work.node);
@@ -1341,23 +1340,14 @@ static int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)
ret++;
node = next;
}
+ loops++;
- if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG)
- atomic_andnot(IORING_SQ_TASKRUN, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
-
- node = io_llist_cmpxchg(&ctx->work_llist, &fake, NULL);
- if (node != &fake) {
- loops++;
- current_final = &fake;
- node = io_llist_xchg(&ctx->work_llist, &fake);
+ if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
goto again;
- }
-
if (*locked)
io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
trace_io_uring_local_work_run(ctx, ret, loops);
return ret;
-
}
static inline int io_run_local_work_locked(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 14:46 [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] io_uring: move submitter_task out of cold cacheline Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] io_uring: refactor io_wake_function Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] io_uring: don't set TASK_RUNNING in local tw runner Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] io_uring: mark io_run_local_work static Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] io_uring: move io_run_local_work_locked Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] io_uring: separate wq for ring polling Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] io_uring: add lazy poll_wq activation Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] io_uring: wake up optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] io_uring: waitqueue-less cq waiting Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] io_uring: add io_req_local_work_add wake fast path Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8839534891f0a2f1076e78554a31ea7e099f7de5.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox