From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: flush task work before waiting for ring exit
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:25:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 4/8/20 1:17 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Here's some more data. I added a WARN_ON_ONCE() for task->flags &
>> PF_EXITING on task_work_add() success, and it triggers with the
>> following backtrace:
> ...
>> which means that we've successfully added the task_work while the
>> process is exiting.
>
> but this is fine, task_work_add(task) can succeed if task->flags & EXITING.
>
> task_work_add(task, work) should only fail if this "task" has already passed
> exit_task_work(). Because if this task has already passed exit_task_work(),
> nothing else can flush this work and call work->func().
So the question remains, we basically have this:
A B
task_work_run(tsk)
task_work_add(tsk, io_poll_task_func())
process cbs
wait_for_completion()
with the last wait needing to flush the work added on the B side, since
that isn't part of the initial list.
I don't I can fully close that race _without_ re-running task work
there. Could do something ala:
A B
mark context "dead"
task_work_run(tsk)
if (context dead)
task_work_add(helper, io_poll_task_func())
else
task_work_add(tsk, io_poll_task_func())
process cbs
wait_for_completion()
which would do the trick, but I still need to flush work after having
marked the context dead.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-08 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 16:02 [PATCHSET v2] io_uring and task_work interactions Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: add task_work_pending() helper Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 17:52 ` Jann Horn
2020-04-07 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: kill current->task_works checking in callers Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] task_work: make exit_work externally visible Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: flush task work before waiting for ring exit Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 16:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-04-07 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-04-07 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-07 20:39 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-04-08 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 19:06 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-04-08 20:25 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-04-08 21:19 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-09 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-04-10 0:29 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-06 19:48 [PATCHSET 0/4] io_uring and task_work interactions Jens Axboe
2020-04-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: flush task work before waiting for ring exit Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox