From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Helge Deller <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
linux-parisc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/5] User mapped provided buffer rings
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:38:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/15/23 2:07?PM, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 3/15/23 21:03, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Thanks for doing those fixes!
>>
>> On 3/14/23 18:16, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> One issue that became apparent when running io_uring code on parisc is
>>> that for data shared between the application and the kernel, we must
>>> ensure that it's placed correctly to avoid aliasing issues that render
>>> it useless.
>>>
>>> The first patch in this series is from Helge, and ensures that the
>>> SQ/CQ rings are mapped appropriately. This makes io_uring actually work
>>> there.
>>>
>>> Patches 2..4 are prep patches for patch 5, which adds a variant of
>>> ring mapped provided buffers that have the kernel allocate the memory
>>> for them and the application mmap() it. This brings these mapped
>>> buffers in line with how the SQ/CQ rings are managed too.
>>>
>>> I'm not fully sure if this ONLY impacts archs that set SHM_COLOUR,
>>> of which there is only parisc, or if SHMLBA setting archs (of which
>>> there are others) are impact to any degree as well...
>>
>> It would be interesting to find out. I'd assume that other arches,
>> e.g. sparc, might have similiar issues.
>> Have you tested your patches on other arches as well?
>
> By the way, I've now tested this series on current git head on an
> older parisc box (with PA8700 / PCX-W2 CPU).
>
> Results of liburing testsuite:
> Tests timed out (1): <send-zerocopy.t> - (may not be a failure)
> Tests failed (5): <buf-ring.t> <file-verify.t> <poll-race-mshot.t> <ringbuf-read.t> <send_recvmsg.t>
send-zerocopy.t takes about ~20 seconds for me on modern hardware, so
that one likely just needs a longer timeout to work. Running it here on
my PA8900:
axboe@c8000 ~/g/liburing (master)> time test/send-zerocopy.t
________________________________________________________
Executed in 115.08 secs fish external
usr time 63.70 secs 1.08 millis 63.70 secs
sys time 57.25 secs 4.26 millis 57.24 secs
which on that box is almost twice as long as the normal timeout for
the test script.
For file-verify.t, that one should work with the current tree. The issue
there is the use of registered buffers, and I added a parisc hack for
that. Maybe it's too specific to the PA8900 (the 128 byte stride). If
your tree does have:
commit 4c4fd1843bf284c0063c3a0f8822cb2d352b20c0 (origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:34:54 2023 -0600
test/file-verify: add dcache sync for parisc
then please experiment with that. 64 might be the correct value here and
I just got lucky with my testing...
be interesting to see
For the remainder, they are all related to the buffer ring, which is
what is enabled by this series. But the tests don't use that yet, so
they will fail just like they do without the patch. In the
ring-buf-alloc branch of liburing there's the start of adding helpers to
setup the buffer rings, and then we can switch them to the mmap()
approach without much trouble. It's just not done yet, I will add a
patch in there to do that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-15 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 17:16 [PATCHSET 0/5] User mapped provided buffer rings Jens Axboe
2023-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: Adjust mapping wrt architecture aliasing requirements Jens Axboe
2023-07-12 4:43 ` matoro
2023-07-12 16:24 ` Helge Deller
2023-07-12 17:28 ` matoro
2023-07-12 19:05 ` Helge Deller
2023-07-12 20:30 ` Helge Deller
2023-07-13 0:35 ` matoro
2023-07-13 7:27 ` Helge Deller
2023-07-13 23:57 ` matoro
2023-07-16 6:54 ` Helge Deller
2023-07-16 18:03 ` matoro
2023-07-16 20:54 ` Helge Deller
2023-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring/kbuf: move pinning of provided buffer ring into helper Jens Axboe
2023-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring/kbuf: add buffer_list->is_mapped member Jens Axboe
2023-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring/kbuf: rename struct io_uring_buf_reg 'pad' to'flags' Jens Axboe
2023-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring Jens Axboe
2023-03-16 18:07 ` Ammar Faizi
2023-03-16 18:42 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-15 20:03 ` [PATCHSET 0/5] User mapped provided buffer rings Helge Deller
2023-03-15 20:07 ` Helge Deller
2023-03-15 20:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-03-15 21:04 ` John David Anglin
2023-03-15 21:08 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-15 21:18 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-16 10:18 ` Helge Deller
2023-03-16 17:00 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-16 19:08 ` John David Anglin
2023-03-16 19:46 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-17 2:09 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-17 2:17 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-17 15:36 ` John David Anglin
2023-03-17 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-17 16:15 ` John David Anglin
2023-03-17 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-15 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox