From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C12C4321E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234247AbiLBRsw (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:48:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43732 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233936AbiLBRsu (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:48:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929AEDEA75 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:48:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id h7so2884728wrs.6 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:48:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GrYhN8At7lRA3r7v6jfxG38dJqlpWb4W/HB7a0y1RSs=; b=GOMnd5uLyMQL2zojRoic+jluaoUSKOUJgnmXJ+k80Gx1MZnLgcOVBbjXf2cuhG59Qm caJP8cTijlU+TWEqDm38aBSqpXZ95IwVfts2W0XblHXc/RzkMkWbNgxqch7AP8EIDtIy unKnzRkMp/3RFMb9CejE2iQroXRRuK2T2C1pgDpK1TzqGbqq973KqkVkyDaCL2mLpmi3 /nYGluNk1XAco1ZCo+JRy8kPNr7ckFnSYuMV/TQnxUx3N/QaS9IqvYqRx0OddWHO6cv4 ofqk/DpFxPV4VC9osdnR5w8saiHDdqpbR8jjy889nwSBt2Uld6t76P+Ye5NV9vYd+KTW PVZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GrYhN8At7lRA3r7v6jfxG38dJqlpWb4W/HB7a0y1RSs=; b=IoDL5nkOK58Dm/tW9QdorjmfLEilEJlvHbGyyytTYUtkKUILkQdyDlWmluWUJrfjfD arTP2WiinI0Lbd4Ff7DVIXk8X4iqG9BkBjX4IyNfkgfonMlXYj4JCV34ei1S7iEro02H GX+1m/JZvlAHpjrguWdJ0lXVjZayk8YWCfAA9s0mvrlZj16ZmTeJQIgX6PzjbwF+8sca uL+n/ROPsBXARFyHLXebZRaSJJuna8Nqf/NmGFd/mysq0T7xqqO17GRlFULS3COadLs9 0+ZN4w28juHr4IB08IcouzAxziCRoM9ZHaHImI950yamc/DxaOi8PmLYpY0+f2MK5lIM Stbg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmDyi2YyFeh3IbMin9Hqu/AEOSs5tDjZfzEJvln5Kw9V18mdulm YwH7XtI/wnkm9rBSVZvfaQ7qqXI39X8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6Lg64KwWimsJ7COwwYGJ/CfwicAg6Kml8958js3kHgKW44pwIEo4C1MoDBTosq7NBUMCSpqA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:526b:0:b0:242:380:c10e with SMTP id l11-20020a5d526b000000b002420380c10emr24116556wrc.132.1670003326945; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 127.0.0.1localhost.com ([2620:10d:c092:600::2:a57e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1-20020adfaac1000000b002238ea5750csm9368585wrc.72.2022.12.02.09.48.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:48:46 -0800 (PST) From: Pavel Begunkov To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe , asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH for-next 2/4] io_uring: revise completion_lock locking Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:47:23 +0000 Message-Id: <88e75d481a65dc295cb59722bb1cf76402d1c06b.1670002973.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org io_kill_timeouts() doesn't post any events but queues everything to task_work. Locking there is needed for protecting linked requests traversing, we should grab completion_lock directly instead of using io_cq_[un]lock helpers. Same goes for __io_req_find_next_prep(). Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- io_uring/io_uring.h | 11 ----------- io_uring/timeout.c | 8 ++++++-- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index c30765579a8e..57c1c0da7648 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -582,6 +582,18 @@ void __io_commit_cqring_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) io_eventfd_flush_signal(ctx); } +static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) + __acquires(ctx->completion_lock) +{ + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); +} + +static inline void io_cq_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) + __releases(ctx->completion_lock) +{ + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); +} + /* keep it inlined for io_submit_flush_completions() */ static inline void io_cq_unlock_post_inline(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) __releases(ctx->completion_lock) @@ -1038,9 +1050,9 @@ static void __io_req_find_next_prep(struct io_kiocb *req) { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - io_cq_lock(ctx); + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); io_disarm_next(req); - io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); } static inline struct io_kiocb *io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h index 2277c05f52a6..ff84c0cfa2f2 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.h +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h @@ -87,17 +87,6 @@ static inline void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req) #define io_for_each_link(pos, head) \ for (pos = (head); pos; pos = pos->link) -static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) - __acquires(ctx->completion_lock) -{ - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); -} - -static inline void io_cq_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) -{ - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); -} - void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); static inline struct io_uring_cqe *io_get_cqe_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, diff --git a/io_uring/timeout.c b/io_uring/timeout.c index 4c6a5666541c..eae005b2d1d2 100644 --- a/io_uring/timeout.c +++ b/io_uring/timeout.c @@ -624,7 +624,11 @@ __cold bool io_kill_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk, struct io_timeout *timeout, *tmp; int canceled = 0; - io_cq_lock(ctx); + /* + * completion_lock is needed for io_match_task(). Take it before + * timeout_lockfirst to keep locking ordering. + */ + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(timeout, tmp, &ctx->timeout_list, list) { struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(timeout); @@ -634,6 +638,6 @@ __cold bool io_kill_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk, canceled++; } spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock); - io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); return canceled != 0; } -- 2.38.1