From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] io_uring/io-wq: forward submission ref to async
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:14:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8990627d9815c320e2bd5e6181e5daf876c3dc47.1583314087.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
First it changes io-wq interfaces. It replaces {get,put}_work() with
free_work(), which guaranteed to be called exactly once. It also enforces
free_work() callback to be non-NULL.
io_uring follows the changes and instead of putting a submission reference
in io_put_req_async_completion(), it will be done in io_free_work(). As
removes io_get_work() with corresponding refcount_inc(), the ref balance
is maintained.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
fs/io-wq.h | 6 ++----
fs/io_uring.c | 31 +++++++++++--------------------
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 82e76011d409..eda36f997dea 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ struct io_wq {
struct io_wqe **wqes;
unsigned long state;
- get_work_fn *get_work;
- put_work_fn *put_work;
+ free_work_fn *free_work;
struct task_struct *manager;
struct user_struct *user;
@@ -509,16 +508,11 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
if (test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_CANCEL, &wq->state))
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
- if (wq->get_work)
- wq->get_work(work);
-
old_work = work;
work->func(&work);
work = (old_work == work) ? NULL : work;
io_assign_current_work(worker, work);
-
- if (wq->put_work)
- wq->put_work(old_work);
+ wq->free_work(old_work);
if (hash != -1U) {
spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
@@ -749,14 +743,17 @@ static bool io_wq_can_queue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct,
return true;
}
-static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work)
+static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wqe *wqe)
{
+ struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
+
do {
struct io_wq_work *old_work = work;
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
work->func(&work);
work = (work == old_work) ? NULL : work;
+ wq->free_work(old_work);
} while (work);
}
@@ -773,7 +770,7 @@ static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
* It's close enough to not be an issue, fork() has the same delay.
*/
if (unlikely(!io_wq_can_queue(wqe, acct, work))) {
- io_run_cancel(work);
+ io_run_cancel(work, wqe);
return;
}
@@ -912,7 +909,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_cb_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
- io_run_cancel(work);
+ io_run_cancel(work, wqe);
return IO_WQ_CANCEL_OK;
}
@@ -987,7 +984,7 @@ static enum io_wq_cancel io_wqe_cancel_work(struct io_wqe *wqe,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqe->lock, flags);
if (found) {
- io_run_cancel(work);
+ io_run_cancel(work, wqe);
return IO_WQ_CANCEL_OK;
}
@@ -1064,6 +1061,9 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
int ret = -ENOMEM, node;
struct io_wq *wq;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!data->free_work))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wq)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -1074,8 +1074,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
- wq->get_work = data->get_work;
- wq->put_work = data->put_work;
+ wq->free_work = data->free_work;
/* caller must already hold a reference to this */
wq->user = data->user;
@@ -1132,7 +1131,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
bool io_wq_get(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_data *data)
{
- if (data->get_work != wq->get_work || data->put_work != wq->put_work)
+ if (data->free_work != wq->free_work)
return false;
return refcount_inc_not_zero(&wq->use_refs);
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.h b/fs/io-wq.h
index a0978d6958f0..2117b9a4f161 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.h
+++ b/fs/io-wq.h
@@ -81,14 +81,12 @@ struct io_wq_work {
*(work) = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = _func }; \
} while (0) \
-typedef void (get_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
-typedef void (put_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
+typedef void (free_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
struct io_wq_data {
struct user_struct *user;
- get_work_fn *get_work;
- put_work_fn *put_work;
+ free_work_fn *free_work;
};
struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data);
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 40ca9e6a5ace..0d6f4b3b8f13 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1558,8 +1558,8 @@ static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_free_req(req);
}
-static void io_put_req_async_completion(struct io_kiocb *req,
- struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static void io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req,
+ struct io_wq_work **workptr)
{
/*
* It's in an io-wq worker, so there always should be at least
@@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@ static void io_put_req_async_completion(struct io_kiocb *req,
* It also means, that if the counter dropped to 1, then there is
* no asynchronous users left, so it's safe to steal the next work.
*/
- refcount_dec(&req->refs);
if (refcount_read(&req->refs) == 1) {
struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
@@ -2578,7 +2577,7 @@ static bool io_req_cancelled(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (req->work.flags & IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL) {
req_set_fail_links(req);
io_cqring_add_event(req, -ECANCELED);
- io_double_put_req(req);
+ io_put_req(req);
return true;
}
@@ -2606,7 +2605,7 @@ static void io_fsync_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
if (io_req_cancelled(req))
return;
__io_fsync(req);
- io_put_req_async_completion(req, workptr);
+ io_steal_work(req, workptr);
}
static int io_fsync(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
@@ -2639,7 +2638,7 @@ static void io_fallocate_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
if (io_req_cancelled(req))
return;
__io_fallocate(req);
- io_put_req_async_completion(req, workptr);
+ io_steal_work(req, workptr);
}
static int io_fallocate_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
@@ -3006,7 +3005,7 @@ static void io_close_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
/* not cancellable, don't do io_req_cancelled() */
__io_close_finish(req);
- io_put_req_async_completion(req, workptr);
+ io_steal_work(req, workptr);
}
static int io_close(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
@@ -3452,7 +3451,7 @@ static void io_accept_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
if (io_req_cancelled(req))
return;
__io_accept(req, false);
- io_put_req_async_completion(req, workptr);
+ io_steal_work(req, workptr);
}
#endif
@@ -4719,7 +4718,7 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
io_put_req(req);
}
- io_put_req_async_completion(req, workptr);
+ io_steal_work(req, workptr);
}
static int io_req_needs_file(struct io_kiocb *req, int fd)
@@ -6105,21 +6104,14 @@ static int io_sqe_files_update(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
return __io_sqe_files_update(ctx, &up, nr_args);
}
-static void io_put_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
+static void io_free_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
- /* Consider that io_put_req_async_completion() relies on this ref */
+ /* Consider that io_steal_work() relies on this ref */
io_put_req(req);
}
-static void io_get_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
-{
- struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
-
- refcount_inc(&req->refs);
-}
-
static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_uring_params *p)
{
@@ -6130,8 +6122,7 @@ static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
int ret = 0;
data.user = ctx->user;
- data.get_work = io_get_work;
- data.put_work = io_put_work;
+ data.free_work = io_free_work;
if (!(p->flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ)) {
/* Do QD, or 4 * CPUS, whatever is smallest */
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 13:14 [PATCH 0/4] io-wq/io_uring locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-04 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-04 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] io-wq: optimise locking in io_worker_handle_work() Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-04 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] io-wq: optimise out *next_work() double lock Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-04 13:14 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-03-04 18:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] io-wq/io_uring locking optimisation Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8990627d9815c320e2bd5e6181e5daf876c3dc47.1583314087.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox