From: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: IORING_OP_POLL_ADD/IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE questions
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:06:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Hi,
I have started to use io_uring with kernel 5.11.16 and libev 4.33.
Actually, I did significantly change libev code mostly to use liburing
instead of replacing most of its boilerplace code for my prototype.
There is no SQPOLL thread in my setup. io_uring initialisation is as
plain as it can be:
ecb_cold
static int
iouring_internal_init (EV_P)
{
struct io_uring_params params = { 0 };
if (!have_monotonic) /* cannot really happen, but what if!! */
return -1;
if (io_uring_queue_init_params(iouring_entries, &iouring_ring,
¶ms) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;
}
I use io_uring for polling O_NONBLOCK TCP sockets.
For the most part, io_uring works as expected EXCEPT for this scenario:
I want to update the polling mask from POLLIN to POLLIN|POLLOUT.
To achieve that, I do submit to SQEs:
inline_speed
void *
iouring_build_user_data(char type, int fd, uint32_t egen)
{
return (void *)((uint32_t)fd | ((__u64)(egen && 0x00ffffff) << 32 )
|
((__u64)type << 56));
}
inline_speed
void
iouring_decode_user_data(uint64_t data, char *type, int *fd, uint32_t
*egen)
{
*type = data >> 56;
*fd = data & 0xffffffffU;
*egen = (data >> 32) & 0x00ffffffU;
}
struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = iouring_sqe_get (EV_A);
printf("%d %d remove %d %u\n", oev, nev, fd, (uint32_t)anfds
[fd].egen);
io_uring_prep_poll_remove(sqe,
iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen));
// io_uring_sqe_set_data(sqe,
iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen));
/* increment generation counter to avoid handling old events
*/
++anfds [fd].egen;
struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = iouring_sqe_get (EV_A);
io_uring_prep_poll_add(sqe, fd, (nev & EV_READ ? POLLIN : 0)
| (nev & EV_WRITE ? POLLOUT : 0));
io_uring_sqe_set_data(sqe,
iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen));
printf("%d %d add %d %u\n", oev, nev, fd, (uint32_t)anfds [fd].egen);
Followed by a io_uring_enter() call buried in liburing code to submit the 2 sqes at the same time:
inline_speed
int
iouring_enter (EV_P_ ev_tstamp timeout)
{
int res;
struct __kernel_timespec ts;
struct io_uring_cqe *cqe_ptr;
EV_TS_SET(ts, timeout);
EV_RELEASE_CB;
res = io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout(&iouring_ring, &cqe_ptr, &ts);
EV_ACQUIRE_CB;
return res;
}
On the CQE processing side, I have the following trace:
// fd is hardcoded to filter out all the calls working fine
if (fd == 85)
printf("85 gen %d res %d\n", (uint32_t)gen, res);
Here is the output:
85 gen 1 res 195
0 1 add 85 1
// Those 2 sqes are submitted at the same time
1 3 remove 85 1
1 3 add 85 2
85 gen 1 res -125
85 gen 1 res 4
When I receive '85 gen 1 res 4', it is discarded because gen 1 poll
request has been cancelled. The code will process gen 2 cqes from
there.
My '1 3 add 85 2' sqe has been silently discarded. After 1 minute of
unexpected fd inactivity, I try to remove my gen 2 POLL request and it
result to a cqe reporting an ENOENT error.
1. 195 is the cqe result for a successful IORING_OP_POLL_ADD
submission. I only check the POLLIN|POLLOUT bits. What is the meaning
of the other bits?
2. I don't understand what I am looking at. Why am I receiving a
completion notification for a POLL request that has just been
cancelled? What is the logic behind silently discarding a
IORING_OP_POLL_ADD sqe meant to replace an existing one?
3. As I am writing this email, I have just noticed that it was possible
to update an existing POLL entry with IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE through
io_uring_prep_poll_update(). Is this what I should do to eliminate my
problems? What are the possible race conditions scenarios that I should
be prepared to handle by using io_uring_prep_poll_update() (ie:
completion of the poll entry to update while my process is inside
io_uring_enter() to update it...)?
thx a lot for your guidance in my io_uring journey!
Olivier
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-04 18:06 Olivier Langlois [this message]
2021-05-05 17:20 ` IORING_OP_POLL_ADD/IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE questions Olivier Langlois
2021-05-05 17:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-06 3:17 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-06 8:42 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-06 15:46 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-06 16:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-06 19:32 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-05-06 17:09 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8992f5f989808798ad2666b0a3ef8ae8d777b7de.camel@trillion01.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox