From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
Cc: Kernel Hardening <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>,
Jann Horn <[email protected]>, Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>,
Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>, Sargun Dhillon <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] io_uring: add restrictions to support untrusted applications and guests
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:01:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/27/20 8:58 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> v6:
> - moved restriction checks in a function [Jens]
> - changed ret value handling in io_register_restrictions() [Jens]
>
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> RFC v2: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]
> RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]
>
> Following the proposal that I send about restrictions [1], I wrote this series
> to add restrictions in io_uring.
>
> I also wrote helpers in liburing and a test case (test/register-restrictions.c)
> available in this repository:
> https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/liburing (branch: io_uring_restrictions)
>
> Just to recap the proposal, the idea is to add some restrictions to the
> operations (sqe opcode and flags, register opcode) to safely allow untrusted
> applications or guests to use io_uring queues.
>
> The first patch changes io_uring_register(2) opcodes into an enumeration to
> keep track of the last opcode available.
>
> The second patch adds IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode and the code to
> handle restrictions.
>
> The third patch adds IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED flag to start the rings disabled,
> allowing the user to register restrictions, buffers, files, before to start
> processing SQEs.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-28 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 14:58 [PATCH v6 0/3] io_uring: add restrictions to support untrusted applications and guests Stefano Garzarella
2020-08-27 14:58 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] io_uring: use an enumeration for io_uring_register(2) opcodes Stefano Garzarella
2020-08-27 14:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] io_uring: add IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-03 14:26 ` Daurnimator
2021-01-07 8:39 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-08-27 14:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] io_uring: allow disabling rings during the creation Stefano Garzarella
2020-09-08 13:44 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-09-08 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-08 14:10 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-09-08 14:11 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-28 3:01 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox