From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/rw: reinstate thread check for retries
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:16:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Allowing retries for everything is arguably the right thing to do, now
that every command type is async read from the start. But it's exposed a
few issues around missing check for a retry (which cca6571381a0 exposed),
and the fixup commit for that isn't necessarily 100% sound in terms of
iov_iter state.
For now, just revert these two commits. This unfortunately then re-opens
the fact that -EAGAIN can get bubbled to userspace for some cases where
the kernel very well could just sanely retry them. But until we have all
the conditions covered around that, we cannot safely enable that.
This reverts commit df604d2ad480fcf7b39767280c9093e13b1de952.
This reverts commit cca6571381a0bdc88021a1f7a4c2349df21279f7.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 64845634d89f..2675cffbd9a4 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -527,19 +527,6 @@ static void io_queue_iowq(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_queue_linked_timeout(link);
}
-static void io_tw_requeue_iowq(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts)
-{
- req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
- io_queue_iowq(req);
-}
-
-void io_tw_queue_iowq(struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
- req->flags |= REQ_F_REISSUE | REQ_F_BL_NO_RECYCLE;
- req->io_task_work.func = io_tw_requeue_iowq;
- io_req_task_work_add(req);
-}
-
static __cold void io_queue_deferred(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
while (!list_empty(&ctx->defer_list)) {
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index b83a719c5443..624ca9076a50 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ struct file *io_file_get_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, int fd,
void __io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned flags);
bool io_alloc_async_data(struct io_kiocb *req);
void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req);
-void io_tw_queue_iowq(struct io_kiocb *req);
void io_req_task_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts);
void io_req_task_queue_fail(struct io_kiocb *req, int ret);
void io_req_task_submit(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts);
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 4fed829fe97c..a6bf2ea8db91 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -396,9 +396,16 @@ static inline loff_t *io_kiocb_update_pos(struct io_kiocb *req)
return NULL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
+static void io_resubmit_prep(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ struct io_async_rw *io = req->async_data;
+
+ iov_iter_restore(&io->iter, &io->iter_state);
+}
+
static bool io_rw_should_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
umode_t mode = file_inode(req->file)->i_mode;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -414,11 +421,23 @@ static bool io_rw_should_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req)
*/
if (percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs))
return false;
+ /*
+ * Play it safe and assume not safe to re-import and reissue if we're
+ * not in the original thread group (or in task context).
+ */
+ if (!same_thread_group(req->task, current) || !in_task())
+ return false;
return true;
+}
#else
+static void io_resubmit_prep(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+}
+static bool io_rw_should_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
return false;
-#endif
}
+#endif
static void io_req_end_write(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
@@ -455,7 +474,7 @@ static bool __io_complete_rw_common(struct io_kiocb *req, long res)
* current cycle.
*/
io_req_io_end(req);
- io_tw_queue_iowq(req);
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_REISSUE | REQ_F_BL_NO_RECYCLE;
return true;
}
req_set_fail(req);
@@ -521,7 +540,7 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res)
io_req_end_write(req);
if (unlikely(res != req->cqe.res)) {
if (res == -EAGAIN && io_rw_should_reissue(req)) {
- io_tw_queue_iowq(req);
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_REISSUE | REQ_F_BL_NO_RECYCLE;
return;
}
req->cqe.res = res;
@@ -583,10 +602,8 @@ static int kiocb_done(struct io_kiocb *req, ssize_t ret,
}
if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE) {
- struct io_async_rw *io = req->async_data;
-
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
- iov_iter_restore(&io->iter, &io->iter_state);
+ io_resubmit_prep(req);
return -EAGAIN;
}
return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
@@ -839,8 +856,7 @@ static int __io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
if (ret == -EAGAIN || (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)) {
- if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)
- return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
+ req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
/* If we can poll, just do that. */
if (io_file_can_poll(req))
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1035,8 +1051,10 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
else
ret2 = -EINVAL;
- if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)
- return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE) {
+ req->flags &= ~REQ_F_REISSUE;
+ ret2 = -EAGAIN;
+ }
/*
* Raw bdev writes will return -EOPNOTSUPP for IOCB_NOWAIT. Just
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox