* [PATCH 0/3] check errors in early init
@ 2025-01-31 16:24 Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors Pavel Begunkov
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-01-31 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
Do the diligence of checking if any of the (inicall) io_uring_init()
fail and if so return an error.
Pavel Begunkov (3):
io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors
io_uring: propagate io_buffer creation errors
io_uring: check for iowq alloc_workqueue errors
io_uring/io_uring.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors
2025-01-31 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] check errors in early init Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-01-31 16:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: propagate io_buffer " Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: check for iowq alloc_workqueue errors Pavel Begunkov
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-01-31 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
It's very unlikely, but in theory cache creation can fail during
initcall, so don't forget to return errors back if something goes wrong.
Fixes: 2b188cc1bb857 ("Add io_uring IO interface")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 263e504be4a8b..9335144495299 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -3916,6 +3916,9 @@ static int __init io_uring_init(void)
req_cachep = kmem_cache_create("io_kiocb", sizeof(struct io_kiocb), &kmem_args,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT |
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU);
+ if (!req_cachep)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
io_buf_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(io_buffer,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: propagate io_buffer creation errors
2025-01-31 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] check errors in early init Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-01-31 16:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: check for iowq alloc_workqueue errors Pavel Begunkov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-01-31 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
It's very unlikely, but in theory cache creation can fail during
initcall, so don't forget to return errors back if something goes wrong.
Fixes: b3a4dbc89d402 ("io_uring/kbuf: Use slab for struct io_buffer objects")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 9335144495299..b05580c1a6424 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -3921,6 +3921,8 @@ static int __init io_uring_init(void)
io_buf_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(io_buffer,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT);
+ if (!io_buf_cachep)
+ return -ENOMEM;
iou_wq = alloc_workqueue("iou_exit", WQ_UNBOUND, 64);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: check for iowq alloc_workqueue errors
2025-01-31 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] check errors in early init Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: propagate io_buffer " Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-01-31 16:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-01-31 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
alloc_workqueue() can fail, check the result and return an error back
from io_uring_init() if needed.
Fixes: 73eaa2b583493 ("io_uring: use private workqueue for exit work")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index b05580c1a6424..78a6cc84304f2 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -3925,6 +3925,8 @@ static int __init io_uring_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
iou_wq = alloc_workqueue("iou_exit", WQ_UNBOUND, 64);
+ if (!iou_wq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
register_sysctl_init("kernel", kernel_io_uring_disabled_table);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-01-31 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-31 16:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2025-01-31 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring
On 1/31/25 9:24 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> It's very unlikely, but in theory cache creation can fail during
> initcall, so don't forget to return errors back if something goes wrong.
This is why SLAB_PANIC is used, it'll panic if this fails. That's
commonly used for setup/init time kind of setups, where we never
expect any failure to occur. Hence this can never return NULL.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors
2025-01-31 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2025-01-31 16:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-01-31 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
On 1/31/25 16:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/31/25 9:24 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> It's very unlikely, but in theory cache creation can fail during
>> initcall, so don't forget to return errors back if something goes wrong.
>
> This is why SLAB_PANIC is used, it'll panic if this fails. That's
> commonly used for setup/init time kind of setups, where we never
> expect any failure to occur. Hence this can never return NULL.
Yeah, missed it, thanks
--
Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-31 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-31 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] check errors in early init Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: propagate req cache creation errors Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-31 16:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: propagate io_buffer " Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: check for iowq alloc_workqueue errors Pavel Begunkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox