From: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
asml.silence@gmail.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: rework large chunks test to use common setup
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 07:54:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90cfcf06-e987-4817-acba-2037a436a744@davidwei.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227171305.2848240-3-kuba@kernel.org>
On 2026-02-27 09:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Commit a32bb32d0193 ("selftests: iou-zcrx: test large chunk sizes")
> and commit de7c600e2d5b ("selftests/net: parametrise iou-zcrx.py with
> ksft_variants") landed at similar time. The large chunks test was
> actually not included in the list of tests, so it never run.
> We haven't noticed that it uses the old-style helpers
> (_get_combined_channels, _get_current_settings, _set_flow_rule)
> that were removed by the other commit.
>
> Rework test_zcrx_large_chunks to reuse the single() setup function
> and add it to the ksft_run cases list so it actually gets executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> CC: shuah@kernel.org
> CC: dw@davidwei.uk
> CC: jdamato@fastly.com
> CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> .../selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py | 31 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
> index c27c2064701d..1649c23e05e2 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
> @@ -135,36 +135,16 @@ SKIP_CODE = 42
>
> cfg.require_ipver('6')
>
> - combined_chans = _get_combined_channels(cfg)
> - if combined_chans < 2:
> - raise KsftSkipEx('at least 2 combined channels required')
> - (rx_ring, hds_thresh) = _get_current_settings(cfg)
> - port = rand_port()
> -
> - ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} tcp-data-split on")
> - defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} tcp-data-split auto")
> -
> - ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} hds-thresh 0")
> - defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} hds-thresh {hds_thresh}")
> -
> - ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} rx 64")
> - defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} rx {rx_ring}")
> -
> - ethtool(f"-X {cfg.ifname} equal {combined_chans - 1}")
> - defer(ethtool, f"-X {cfg.ifname} default")
> -
> - flow_rule_id = _set_flow_rule(cfg, port, combined_chans - 1)
> - defer(ethtool, f"-N {cfg.ifname} delete {flow_rule_id}")
> -
> - rx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_local} -s -p {port} -i {cfg.ifname} -q {combined_chans - 1} -x 2"
> - tx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_remote} -c -h {cfg.addr_v['6']} -p {port} -l 12840"
> + single(cfg)
Let's use ksft_variants() with both single() and rss()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 17:13 [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: improve stability and make the large chunk test work Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-27 17:13 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: wait for memory provider cleanup Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-02 15:32 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-03-02 15:49 ` David Wei
2026-03-03 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-03 1:39 ` David Wei
2026-02-27 17:13 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: rework large chunks test to use common setup Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-02 15:54 ` David Wei [this message]
2026-03-03 0:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-03 1:44 ` David Wei
2026-02-27 17:13 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: allocate hugepages for large chunks test Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-02 15:16 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-03-03 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-03 8:41 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-03-03 4:47 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: improve stability and make the large chunk test work patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90cfcf06-e987-4817-acba-2037a436a744@davidwei.uk \
--to=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox