From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.15 0/3] small code clean
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 07:56:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/13/21 1:58 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> 在 2021/8/13 上午1:28, Jens Axboe 写道:
>> On 8/11/21 10:14 PM, Hao Xu wrote:
>>> Some small code clean.
>>>
>>> Hao Xu (3):
>>> io_uring: extract io_uring_files_cancel() in io_uring_task_cancel()
>>> io_uring: remove files pointer in cancellation functions
>>> io_uring: code clean for completion_lock in io_arm_poll_handler()
>>>
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 15 ++++++---------
>>> include/linux/io_uring.h | 9 +++++----
>>> kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> This looks good, except 3/3 which I think was rebased and then not
>> re-tested after doing so... That's a black mark.
>>
> Actually I re-tested it after rebasing code and addressing the conflict
> But the liburing tests results seems all good. Anyway, I'll check the
> code more carefully when resolving conflict.
Probably would only complain if you had PROVE_LOCKING enabled in
your config.
The last patch broke !CONFIG_IO_URING too, I fixed that up.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 4:14 [PATCH for-5.15 0/3] small code clean Hao Xu
2021-08-12 4:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: extract io_uring_files_cancel() in io_uring_task_cancel() Hao Xu
2021-08-12 4:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: remove files pointer in cancellation functions Hao Xu
2021-08-12 4:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: code clean for completion_lock in io_arm_poll_handler() Hao Xu
2021-08-12 7:34 ` Joseph Qi
2021-08-12 7:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Hao Xu
2021-08-12 17:28 ` [PATCH for-5.15 0/3] small code clean Jens Axboe
2021-08-13 7:58 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-13 13:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox