From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:52:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 08:46 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/24/22 8:42 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 3/24/22 8:34 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > > Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When
> > > enabled this
> > > causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which
> > > means you
> > > cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.
> > >
> > > By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is
> > > armed as
> > > usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.
> > >
> > > note: If multiple accepts are queued up, then when a single
> > > connection
> > > comes in they all complete, one with the connection, and the
> > > remaining
> > > with EAGAIN. This could be improved in the future but will
> > > require a lot
> > > of io_uring changes.
> >
> > Not true - all you'd need to do is have behavior similar to
> > EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, which we already support for separate poll. Could
> > be
> > done for internal poll quite easily, and _probably_ makes sense to
> > do by
> > default for most cases in fact.
>
> Quick wire-up below. Not tested at all, but really should basically
> as
> simple as this.
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 4d98cc820a5c..8dfacb476726 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ struct io_op_def {
> /* set if opcode supports polled "wait" */
> unsigned pollin : 1;
> unsigned pollout : 1;
> + unsigned poll_exclusive : 1;
> /* op supports buffer selection */
> unsigned buffer_select : 1;
> /* do prep async if is going to be punted */
> @@ -1061,6 +1062,7 @@ static const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
> .needs_file = 1,
> .unbound_nonreg_file = 1,
> .pollin = 1,
> + .poll_exclusive = 1,
> },
> [IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL] = {
> .audit_skip = 1,
> @@ -6293,6 +6295,8 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb
> *req, unsigned issue_flags)
> } else {
> mask |= POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
> }
> + if (def->poll_exclusive)
> + mask |= EPOLLEXCLUSIVE;
>
> if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED) &&
> !list_empty(&ctx->apoll_cache)) {
>
Thanks!
Will take a look and update the test case to check it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 14:34 [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets Dylan Yudaken
2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-24 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-24 14:52 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91c5baf40ef60f0eabbe13986f2462d871caeacf.camel@fb.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox