public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
@ 2022-03-24 14:34 Dylan Yudaken
  2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
  2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Yudaken @ 2022-03-24 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: kernel-team, Dylan Yudaken

Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When enabled this
causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which means you
cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.

By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is armed as
usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.

note: If multiple accepts are queued up, then when a single connection
comes in they all complete, one with the connection, and the remaining
with EAGAIN. This could be improved in the future but will require a lot
of io_uring changes.

Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 88556e654c5a..a2a71e76e0da 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5603,9 +5603,6 @@ static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	struct file *file;
 	int ret, fd;
 
-	if (req->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_NOWAIT;
-
 	if (!fixed) {
 		fd = __get_unused_fd_flags(accept->flags, accept->nofile);
 		if (unlikely(fd < 0))

base-commit: 8a3e8ee56417f5e0e66580d93941ed9d6f4c8274
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
  2022-03-24 14:34 [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets Dylan Yudaken
@ 2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
  2022-03-24 14:46   ` Jens Axboe
  2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-24 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dylan Yudaken, Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: kernel-team

On 3/24/22 8:34 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When enabled this
> causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which means you
> cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.
> 
> By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is armed as
> usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.
> 
> note: If multiple accepts are queued up, then when a single connection
> comes in they all complete, one with the connection, and the remaining
> with EAGAIN. This could be improved in the future but will require a lot
> of io_uring changes.

Not true - all you'd need to do is have behavior similar to
EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, which we already support for separate poll. Could be
done for internal poll quite easily, and _probably_ makes sense to do by
default for most cases in fact.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
  2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-24 14:46   ` Jens Axboe
  2022-03-24 14:52     ` Dylan Yudaken
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dylan Yudaken, Pavel Begunkov, io-uring; +Cc: kernel-team

On 3/24/22 8:42 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/24/22 8:34 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
>> Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When enabled this
>> causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which means you
>> cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.
>>
>> By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is armed as
>> usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.
>>
>> note: If multiple accepts are queued up, then when a single connection
>> comes in they all complete, one with the connection, and the remaining
>> with EAGAIN. This could be improved in the future but will require a lot
>> of io_uring changes.
> 
> Not true - all you'd need to do is have behavior similar to
> EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, which we already support for separate poll. Could be
> done for internal poll quite easily, and _probably_ makes sense to do by
> default for most cases in fact.

Quick wire-up below. Not tested at all, but really should basically as
simple as this.

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 4d98cc820a5c..8dfacb476726 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ struct io_op_def {
 	/* set if opcode supports polled "wait" */
 	unsigned		pollin : 1;
 	unsigned		pollout : 1;
+	unsigned		poll_exclusive : 1;
 	/* op supports buffer selection */
 	unsigned		buffer_select : 1;
 	/* do prep async if is going to be punted */
@@ -1061,6 +1062,7 @@ static const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
 		.needs_file		= 1,
 		.unbound_nonreg_file	= 1,
 		.pollin			= 1,
+		.poll_exclusive		= 1,
 	},
 	[IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL] = {
 		.audit_skip		= 1,
@@ -6293,6 +6295,8 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
 	} else {
 		mask |= POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
 	}
+	if (def->poll_exclusive)
+		mask |= EPOLLEXCLUSIVE;
 
 	if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED) &&
 	    !list_empty(&ctx->apoll_cache)) {

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
  2022-03-24 14:46   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-24 14:52     ` Dylan Yudaken
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Yudaken @ 2022-03-24 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Cc: Kernel Team

On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 08:46 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/24/22 8:42 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 3/24/22 8:34 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > > Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When
> > > enabled this
> > > causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which
> > > means you
> > > cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.
> > > 
> > > By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is
> > > armed as
> > > usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.
> > > 
> > > note: If multiple accepts are queued up, then when a single
> > > connection
> > > comes in they all complete, one with the connection, and the
> > > remaining
> > > with EAGAIN. This could be improved in the future but will
> > > require a lot
> > > of io_uring changes.
> > 
> > Not true - all you'd need to do is have behavior similar to
> > EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, which we already support for separate poll. Could
> > be
> > done for internal poll quite easily, and _probably_ makes sense to
> > do by
> > default for most cases in fact.
> 
> Quick wire-up below. Not tested at all, but really should basically
> as
> simple as this.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 4d98cc820a5c..8dfacb476726 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ struct io_op_def {
>         /* set if opcode supports polled "wait" */
>         unsigned                pollin : 1;
>         unsigned                pollout : 1;
> +       unsigned                poll_exclusive : 1;
>         /* op supports buffer selection */
>         unsigned                buffer_select : 1;
>         /* do prep async if is going to be punted */
> @@ -1061,6 +1062,7 @@ static const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
>                 .needs_file             = 1,
>                 .unbound_nonreg_file    = 1,
>                 .pollin                 = 1,
> +               .poll_exclusive         = 1,
>         },
>         [IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL] = {
>                 .audit_skip             = 1,
> @@ -6293,6 +6295,8 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb
> *req, unsigned issue_flags)
>         } else {
>                 mask |= POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
>         }
> +       if (def->poll_exclusive)
> +               mask |= EPOLLEXCLUSIVE;
>  
>         if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED) &&
>             !list_empty(&ctx->apoll_cache)) {
> 

Thanks!

Will take a look and update the test case to check it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
  2022-03-24 14:34 [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets Dylan Yudaken
  2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-24 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring, Dylan Yudaken; +Cc: kernel-team

On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:34:35 -0700, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> Do not set REQ_F_NOWAIT if the socket is non blocking. When enabled this
> causes the accept to immediately post a CQE with EAGAIN, which means you
> cannot perform an accept SQE on a NONBLOCK socket asynchronously.
> 
> By removing the flag if there is no pending accept then poll is armed as
> usual and when a connection comes in the CQE is posted.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets
      commit: 6d4809f49bec8dc3b244debcb97f78239e52f5bb

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-24 18:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-24 14:34 [PATCH] io_uring: allow async accept on O_NONBLOCK sockets Dylan Yudaken
2022-03-24 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-24 14:46   ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-24 14:52     ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox