From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: make OP_CLOSE consistent direct open
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:06:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/24/21 1:57 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/24/21 1:04 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> From recently open/accept are now able to manipulate fixed file table,
>> but it's inconsistent that close can't. Close the gap, keep API same as
>> with open/accept, i.e. via sqe->file_slot.
>
> I really think we should do this for 5.15 to make the API a bit more
> sane from the user point of view, folks definitely expect being able
> to use IORING_OP_CLOSE with a fixed file that they got with IORING_OP_OPEN,
> for example.
>
> How about this small tweak, basically making it follow the same rules
> as other commands that do fixed files:
>
> 1) Require IOSQE_FIXED_FILE to be set for a direct close. sqe->file_index
> will be the descriptor to close in that case. If sqe->fd is set, we
> -EINVAL the request.
>
> 2) If IOSQE_FIXED_FILE isn't set, it's a normal close. As before, if
> sqe->file_index is set and IOSQE_FIXED_FILE isn't, then we -EINVAL
> the request.
>
> Basically this incremental on top of yours.
Hmm, we don't require that for open or accept. Why not? Seems a bit
counter intuitive. But maybe it's better we do this one as-is, and then
do a followup patch that solidifies the fact that IOSQE_FIXED_FILE
should be set for direct open/accept/close.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-24 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-24 19:04 [PATCH] io_uring: make OP_CLOSE consistent direct open Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 19:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 20:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-09-24 20:11 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 20:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 19:58 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox