public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: make OP_CLOSE consistent direct open
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:06:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 9/24/21 1:57 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/24/21 1:04 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> From recently open/accept are now able to manipulate fixed file table,
>> but it's inconsistent that close can't. Close the gap, keep API same as
>> with open/accept, i.e. via sqe->file_slot.
> 
> I really think we should do this for 5.15 to make the API a bit more
> sane from the user point of view, folks definitely expect being able
> to use IORING_OP_CLOSE with a fixed file that they got with IORING_OP_OPEN,
> for example.
> 
> How about this small tweak, basically making it follow the same rules
> as other commands that do fixed files:
> 
> 1) Require IOSQE_FIXED_FILE to be set for a direct close. sqe->file_index
>    will be the descriptor to close in that case. If sqe->fd is set, we
>    -EINVAL the request.
> 
> 2) If IOSQE_FIXED_FILE isn't set, it's a normal close. As before, if
>    sqe->file_index is set and IOSQE_FIXED_FILE isn't, then we -EINVAL
>    the request.
> 
> Basically this incremental on top of yours.

Hmm, we don't require that for open or accept. Why not? Seems a bit
counter intuitive. But maybe it's better we do this one as-is, and then
do a followup patch that solidifies the fact that IOSQE_FIXED_FILE
should be set for direct open/accept/close.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-24 19:04 [PATCH] io_uring: make OP_CLOSE consistent direct open Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 19:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 20:06   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-09-24 20:11     ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:19       ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 20:21         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 20:25           ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 19:58 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-24 19:59   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox