public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	io-uring <[email protected]>,
	linux-kernel <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:25:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

在 2022/2/21 上午2:37, Olivier Langlois 写道:
> On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 17:22 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Outside of this, I was hoping to see some performance numbers in the
>> main patch. Sounds like you have them, can you share?
>>
> Yes.
> 
> It is not much. Only numbers from my application and it is far from
> being the best benchmark because the result can be influenced by
> multiple external factors.
> 
> Beside addressing the race condition remaining inside io_cqring_wait()
> around napi_list for v2 patch, creating a benchmark program that
> isolate the performance of the new feature is on my todo list.
> 
> I would think that creating a simple UDP ping-pong setup and measure

An echo-server may be a good choice.
> RTT with and without busy_polling should be a good enough test.
> 
> In the meantime, here are the results that I have:
> 
> Without io_uring busy poll:
> reaction time to an update: 17159usec
> reaction time to an update: 19068usec
> reaction time to an update: 23055usec
> reaction time to an update: 16511usec
> reaction time to an update: 17604usec
> 
> With io_uring busy poll:
> reaction time to an update: 15782usec
> reaction time to an update: 15337usec
> reaction time to an update: 15379usec
> reaction time to an update: 15275usec
> reaction time to an update: 15107usec
> 
> Concerning my latency issue with busy polling, I have found this that
> might help me:
> https://lwn.net/ml/netdev/[email protected]/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-21  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-19  8:03 [PATCH v1] io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll Olivier Langlois
2022-02-19 21:42 ` Olivier Langlois
2022-02-20  0:22   ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-20 18:37     ` Olivier Langlois
2022-02-20 19:38       ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-21 19:29         ` Olivier Langlois
2022-02-21  5:25       ` Hao Xu [this message]
2022-02-20 20:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-20 21:53 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-20 21:53 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-21  5:23 ` Hao Xu
2022-02-25  5:32   ` Olivier Langlois
2022-02-25 15:32     ` Olivier Langlois
2022-02-28 18:34       ` Hao Xu
2022-02-28 21:20         ` Olivier Langlois
2022-03-01  3:53           ` Hao Xu
2022-02-28 18:26     ` Hao Xu
2022-02-28 21:01       ` Olivier Langlois
2022-03-01  8:23         ` Hao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96ad477e-138b-b588-3017-8b60dd9443f1@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox