public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Clean up alloc_cache allocations
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:05:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 11/18/24 6:22 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Jens, Pavel,
> 
> The allocation paths that use alloc_cache duplicate the same code
> pattern, sometimes in a quite convoluted way.  This series cleans up
> that code by folding the allocation into the cache code itself, making
> it just an allocator function, and keeping the cache policy invisible to
> callers.  A bigger justification for doing this, beyond code simplicity,
> is that it makes it trivial to test the impact of disabling the cache
> and using slab directly, which I've used for slab improvement
> experiments.  I think this is one step forward in the direction
> eventually lifting the alloc_cache into a proper magazine layer in slab
> out of io_uring.

Nice!

Patchset looks good, from a quick look, even from just a cleanup
perspective. We're obviously inside the merge window right now, so it's
a 6.14 target at this point. I'll take some timer to review it a bit
closer later this week.

> It survived liburing testsuite, and when microbenchmarking the
> read-write path with mmtests and fio, I didn't observe any significant
> performance variation (there was actually a 2% gain, but that was
> within the variance of the test runs, making it not signficant and
> surely test noise).
> 
> I'm specifically interested, and happy to do so, if there are specific
> benchmarks you'd like me to run it against.

In general, running the liburing test suite with various types of files
and devices and with KASAN and LOCKDEP turned on is a good test of not
having messed something up, in a big way at least. But maybe you already
ran that too?

-- 
Jens Axboe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-19  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19  1:22 [PATCH 0/9] Clean up alloc_cache allocations Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] io_uring: Fold allocation into alloc_cache helper Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  2:02   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-19 15:30     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19 16:18       ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] io_uring: Add generic helper to allocate async data Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_uring/futex: Allocate ifd with generic alloc_cache helper Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 4/9] io_uring/poll: Allocate apoll " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] io_uring/uring_cmd: Allocate async data through generic helper Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] io_uring/net: Allocate msghdr async data through helper Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] io_uring/rw: Allocate " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] io_uring: Move old async data allocation helper to header Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  1:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] io_uring/msg_ring: Drop custom destructor Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-11-19  2:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-11-19 15:31   ` [PATCH 0/9] Clean up alloc_cache allocations Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox