public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 17:33:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 31/05/2020 17:12, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>> A v5 with those two things would be ready to commit.
> First thanks for figuring out this bug.
> Indeed, I had run test cases in liburing/test multiple rounds before sending
> V4 patches, and all test cases pass, no kernel issues occurred, here is my kernel
> build config, seems that I had kasan enabled.
> [lege@localhost linux]$ cat .config | grep KASAN
> CONFIG_KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET=0xdffffc0000000000
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC=y
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_KASAN=y
> CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE=y
> # CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE is not set
> CONFIG_KASAN_STACK=1
> # CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC is not set
> # CONFIG_TEST_KASAN is not set
> But I don't know why I did't reproduce the bug, sorry.

Hmm, can't find an option to poison allocated mem. Try to fill req->work
with garbage by hand (just after allocation), should help to reproduce.

> 
> Are you fine below changes?
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 12296ce3e8b9..2a3a02838f7b 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -907,9 +907,10 @@ static void io_file_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
>  static inline void io_req_init_async(struct io_kiocb *req,
>                         void (*func)(struct io_wq_work **))
>  {
> -       if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED)
> -               req->work.func = func;
> -       else {
> +       if (req->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED) {
> +               if (!req->work.func)

->func should be initialised after alloc then, if not already.

> +                       req->work.func = func;
> +       } else {
>                 req->work = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = func };
>                 req->flags |= REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED;
>         }
> @@ -2920,6 +2921,8 @@ static int __io_splice_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
>                 return ret;
>         req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
> 
> +       /* Splice will be punted aync, so initialize io_wq_work firstly_*/
> +       io_req_init_async(req, io_wq_submit_work);
>         if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(sp->file_in)->i_mode))
>                 req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND;
> 
> @@ -3592,6 +3595,9 @@ static int io_statx(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
> 
>  static int io_close_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>  {
> +        /* Close may be punted aync, so initialize io_wq_work firstly */

s/aync/async/

> +       io_req_init_async(req, io_wq_submit_work);
> +
>         /*
>          * If we queue this for async, it must not be cancellable. That would
>          * leave the 'file' in an undeterminate state.
> 
> Regards,
> Xiaoguang Wang
> 
> 
>>

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-30 14:39 [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-30 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:14   ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:29     ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-30 17:36       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 13:57         ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:49           ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 14:12       ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:31         ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-05-31 14:57           ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-05-31 16:15             ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01 10:43               ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-01 11:50                 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01  4:56             ` [PATCH v5 " Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-01  4:56               ` [PATCH v5 2/2] io_uring: avoid unnecessary io_wq_work copy for fast poll feature Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-02  1:16                 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-03 13:46                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 15:02                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 20:36                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 20:57                         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-07 23:29                           ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-08  7:43                             ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-08 12:14                               ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-06-08 20:08                                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-07 23:26                         ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-31 14:33         ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox