From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
syzbot <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [syzbot] INFO: task hung in io_sq_thread_park (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:38:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 7/19/21 11:28 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/19/21 6:13 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/19/21 10:57 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 7/16/21 11:57 AM, syzbot wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
>>>> WARNING in io_uring_cancel_generic
>>>
>>> __arm_poll doesn't remove a second poll entry in case of failed
>>> __io_queue_proc(), it's most likely the cause here.
>>>
>>> #syz test: https://github.com/isilence/linux.git syztest_sqpoll_hang
>>
>> Was my thought on seeing the last debug run too. Haven't written a test
>> case, but my initial thought was catching this at the time that double
>> poll is armed, in __io_queue_proc(). Totally untested, just tossing
>> it out there.
>
> Wouldn't help, unfortunately, the way syz triggers it is making a
> request to go through __io_queue_proc() three times.
>
> Either it's 3 waitqueues or we need to extend the check below to
> the double poll entry.
>
> if (poll_one->head == head)
> return;
Yes good point, that'd depend on single poll erroring first. Given
the variety of cases for it, catching it after the fact like in your
patch is likely the simplest/cleanest way.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 3:19 [syzbot] INFO: task hung in io_sq_thread_park (2) syzbot
2021-07-15 8:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-15 9:15 ` syzbot
2021-07-15 18:16 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-16 0:14 ` syzbot
2021-07-16 10:38 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-16 10:57 ` syzbot
2021-07-19 13:15 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-19 13:46 ` syzbot
2021-07-19 16:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-19 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
2021-07-19 17:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-19 18:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-07-19 17:15 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox