public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] io_uring: optimise non-drain path
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:37:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98d2fff8c4da5144bb0d08499f591d4768128ea3.1623709150.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Replace drain checks with one-way flag set upon seeing the first
IOSQE_IO_DRAIN request. There are several places where it cuts cycles
well:

1) It's much faster than the fast check with two
conditions in io_drain_req() including pretty complex
list_empty_careful().

2) We can mark io_queue_sqe() inline now, that's a huge win.

3) It replaces timeout and drain checks in io_commit_cqring() with a
single flags test. Also great not touching ->defer_list there without a
reason so limiting cache bouncing.

It adds a small amount of overhead to drain path, but it's negligible.
The main nuisance is that once it meets any DRAIN request in io_uring
instance lifetime it will _always_ go through a slower path, so
drain-less and offset-mode timeout less applications are preferable.
The overhead in that case would be not big, but it's worth to bear in
mind.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 29b705201ca3..5828ffdbea82 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
 		unsigned int		eventfd_async: 1;
 		unsigned int		restricted: 1;
 		unsigned int		off_timeout_used: 1;
+		unsigned int		drain_used: 1;
 	} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 	/* submission data */
@@ -1299,9 +1300,9 @@ static void io_kill_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req, int status)
 	}
 }
 
-static void __io_queue_deferred(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static void io_queue_deferred(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	do {
+	while (!list_empty(&ctx->defer_list)) {
 		struct io_defer_entry *de = list_first_entry(&ctx->defer_list,
 						struct io_defer_entry, list);
 
@@ -1310,17 +1311,12 @@ static void __io_queue_deferred(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 		list_del_init(&de->list);
 		io_req_task_queue(de->req);
 		kfree(de);
-	} while (!list_empty(&ctx->defer_list));
+	}
 }
 
 static void io_flush_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	u32 seq;
-
-	if (likely(!ctx->off_timeout_used))
-		return;
-
-	seq = ctx->cached_cq_tail - atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts);
+	u32 seq = ctx->cached_cq_tail - atomic_read(&ctx->cq_timeouts);
 
 	while (!list_empty(&ctx->timeout_list)) {
 		u32 events_needed, events_got;
@@ -1350,13 +1346,14 @@ static void io_flush_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 
 static void io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	io_flush_timeouts(ctx);
-
+	if (unlikely(ctx->off_timeout_used || ctx->drain_used)) {
+		if (ctx->off_timeout_used)
+			io_flush_timeouts(ctx);
+		if (ctx->drain_used)
+			io_queue_deferred(ctx);
+	}
 	/* order cqe stores with ring update */
 	smp_store_release(&ctx->rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
-
-	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&ctx->defer_list)))
-		__io_queue_deferred(ctx);
 }
 
 static inline bool io_sqring_full(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -6447,9 +6444,9 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		io_queue_linked_timeout(linked_timeout);
 }
 
-static void io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static inline void io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
-	if (io_drain_req(req))
+	if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_used) && io_drain_req(req))
 		return;
 
 	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC))) {
@@ -6573,6 +6570,23 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
 		io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
+
+	if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)) {
+		ctx->drain_used = true;
+
+		/*
+		 * Taking sequential execution of a link, draining both sides
+		 * of the link also fullfils IOSQE_IO_DRAIN semantics for all
+		 * requests in the link. So, it drains the head and the
+		 * next after the link request. The last one is done via
+		 * drain_next flag to persist the effect across calls.
+		 */
+		if (link->head) {
+			link->head->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN;
+			ctx->drain_next = 1;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = io_req_prep(req, sqe);
 	if (unlikely(ret))
 		goto fail_req;
@@ -6591,17 +6605,6 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
 	if (link->head) {
 		struct io_kiocb *head = link->head;
 
-		/*
-		 * Taking sequential execution of a link, draining both sides
-		 * of the link also fullfils IOSQE_IO_DRAIN semantics for all
-		 * requests in the link. So, it drains the head and the
-		 * next after the link request. The last one is done via
-		 * drain_next flag to persist the effect across calls.
-		 */
-		if (req->flags & REQ_F_IO_DRAIN) {
-			head->flags |= REQ_F_IO_DRAIN;
-			ctx->drain_next = 1;
-		}
 		ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
 		if (unlikely(ret))
 			goto fail_req;
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-14 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 22:37 [PATCH 5.14 00/12] for-next optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] io_uring: keep SQ pointers in a single cacheline Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] io_uring: move ctx->flags from SQ cacheline Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] io_uring: shuffle more fields into SQ ctx section Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] io_uring: refactor io_get_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] io_uring: don't cache number of dropped SQEs Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 06/12] io_uring: optimise completion timeout flushing Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] io_uring: small io_submit_sqe() optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] io_uring: clean up check_overflow flag Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] io_uring: wait heads renaming Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 10/12] io_uring: move uring_lock location Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` [PATCH 11/12] io_uring: refactor io_req_defer() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 22:37 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-06-15 12:27 ` [PATCH 5.14 00/12] for-next optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-15 21:38 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98d2fff8c4da5144bb0d08499f591d4768128ea3.1623709150.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox