[PATCH v2 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove

[PATCH v2 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove

[Pavel Begunkov]

1-2 are are small improvements

The rest moves all poll update into IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE,
see 5/5 for justification.

v2: fix io_poll_remove_one() on the remove request, not the one
we cancel.

Pavel Begunkov (5):
  io_uring: improve sqpoll event/state handling
  io_uring: refactor io_ring_exit_work()
  io_uring: fix POLL_REMOVE removing apoll
  io_uring: add helper for parsing poll events
  io_uring: move poll update into remove not add

 fs/io_uring.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH v2 1/5] io_uring: improve sqpoll event/state handling

[Pavel Begunkov]

As sqd->state changes rarely, don't check every event one by one but
look them all at once. Add a helper function. Also don't go into event
waiting sleeping with STOP flag set.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e3b679c5547e..693fb5c5e58c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6742,6 +6742,11 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
 	return submitted;
 }
 
+static inline bool io_sqd_events_pending(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(sqd->state);
+}
+
 static inline void io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	/* Tell userspace we may need a wakeup call */
@@ -6796,6 +6801,24 @@ static void io_sqd_update_thread_idle(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
 	sqd->sq_thread_idle = sq_thread_idle;
 }
 
+static bool io_sqd_handle_event(struct io_sq_data *sqd)
+{
+	bool did_sig = false;
+	struct ksignal ksig;
+
+	if (test_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &sqd->state) ||
+	    signal_pending(current)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&sqd->lock);
+		if (signal_pending(current))
+			did_sig = get_signal(&ksig);
+		cond_resched();
+		mutex_lock(&sqd->lock);
+	}
+	io_run_task_work();
+	io_run_task_work_head(&sqd->park_task_work);
+	return did_sig || test_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &sqd->state);
+}
+
 static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 {
 	struct io_sq_data *sqd = data;
@@ -6818,29 +6841,17 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 	/* a user may had exited before the thread wstarted */
 	io_run_task_work_head(&sqd->park_task_work);
 
-	while (!test_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &sqd->state)) {
+	while (1) {
 		int ret;
 		bool cap_entries, sqt_spin, needs_sched;
 
-		if (test_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &sqd->state) ||
-		    signal_pending(current)) {
-			bool did_sig = false;
-
-			mutex_unlock(&sqd->lock);
-			if (signal_pending(current)) {
-				struct ksignal ksig;
-
-				did_sig = get_signal(&ksig);
-			}
-			cond_resched();
-			mutex_lock(&sqd->lock);
-			io_run_task_work();
-			io_run_task_work_head(&sqd->park_task_work);
-			if (did_sig)
+		if (io_sqd_events_pending(sqd) || signal_pending(current)) {
+			if (io_sqd_handle_event(sqd))
 				break;
 			timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle;
 			continue;
 		}
+
 		sqt_spin = false;
 		cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list);
 		list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
@@ -6877,7 +6888,7 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (needs_sched && !test_bit(IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &sqd->state)) {
+		if (needs_sched && !io_sqd_events_pending(sqd)) {
 			list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
 				io_ring_set_wakeup_flag(ctx);
 
-- 
2.24.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] io_uring: improve sqpoll event/state handling

[Jens Axboe]

On 4/14/21 6:38 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> As sqd->state changes rarely, don't check every event one by one but
> look them all at once. Add a helper function. Also don't go into event
> waiting sleeping with STOP flag set.

Can we defer this one to post -rc1? It'll cause a conflict with
5.12.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] io_uring: improve sqpoll event/state handling

[Pavel Begunkov]

On 14/04/2021 17:41, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/14/21 6:38 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> As sqd->state changes rarely, don't check every event one by one but
>> look them all at once. Add a helper function. Also don't go into event
>> waiting sleeping with STOP flag set.
> 
> Can we defer this one to post -rc1? It'll cause a conflict with
> 5.12.

Yeah, just as always drop what doesn't fit, and  I'll resend after
rebase or for 5.14

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

[PATCH v2 2/5] io_uring: refactor io_ring_exit_work()

[Pavel Begunkov]

Don't reinit io_ring_exit_work()'s exit work/completions on each
iteration, that's wasteful. Also add list_rotate_left(), so if we failed
to complete the task job, we don't try it again and again but defer it
until others are processed.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 693fb5c5e58c..6a70bf455c49 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8601,6 +8601,9 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies, timeout));
 	} while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->ref_comp, HZ/20));
 
+	init_completion(&exit.completion);
+	init_task_work(&exit.task_work, io_tctx_exit_cb);
+	exit.ctx = ctx;
 	/*
 	 * Some may use context even when all refs and requests have been put,
 	 * and they are free to do so while still holding uring_lock or
@@ -8613,9 +8616,8 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 		node = list_first_entry(&ctx->tctx_list, struct io_tctx_node,
 					ctx_node);
-		exit.ctx = ctx;
-		init_completion(&exit.completion);
-		init_task_work(&exit.task_work, io_tctx_exit_cb);
+		/* don't spin on a single task if cancellation failed */
+		list_rotate_left(&ctx->tctx_list);
 		ret = task_work_add(node->task, &exit.task_work, TWA_SIGNAL);
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
 			continue;
@@ -8623,7 +8625,6 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 		mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 		wait_for_completion(&exit.completion);
-		cond_resched();
 		mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH v2 3/5] io_uring: fix POLL_REMOVE removing apoll

[Pavel Begunkov]

Don't allow REQ_OP_POLL_REMOVE to kill apoll requests, users should not
know about it. Also, remove weird -EACCESS in io_poll_update(), it
shouldn't know anything about apoll, and have to work even if happened
to have a poll and an async poll'ed request with same user_data.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 6a70bf455c49..ce75a859a376 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5258,7 +5258,8 @@ static bool io_poll_remove_all(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk,
 	return posted != 0;
 }
 
-static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr)
+static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr,
+				     bool poll_only)
 	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *list;
@@ -5268,18 +5269,20 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_poll_find(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr)
 	hlist_for_each_entry(req, list, hash_node) {
 		if (sqe_addr != req->user_data)
 			continue;
+		if (poll_only && req->opcode != IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
+			continue;
 		return req;
 	}
-
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static int io_poll_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr)
+static int io_poll_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr,
+			  bool poll_only)
 	__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
 
-	req = io_poll_find(ctx, sqe_addr);
+	req = io_poll_find(ctx, sqe_addr, poll_only);
 	if (!req)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	if (io_poll_remove_one(req))
@@ -5311,7 +5314,7 @@ static int io_poll_remove(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	int ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, req->poll_remove.addr);
+	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, req->poll_remove.addr, true);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -5412,14 +5415,10 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	int ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	preq = io_poll_find(ctx, req->poll_update.old_user_data);
+	preq = io_poll_find(ctx, req->poll_update.old_user_data, true);
 	if (!preq) {
 		ret = -ENOENT;
 		goto err;
-	} else if (preq->opcode != IORING_OP_POLL_ADD) {
-		/* don't allow internal poll updates */
-		ret = -EACCES;
-		goto err;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -5748,7 +5747,7 @@ static void io_async_find_and_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 	ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto done;
-	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
+	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr, false);
 done:
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = success_ret;
@@ -5790,7 +5789,7 @@ static int io_async_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto done;
-	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
+	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr, false);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto done;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH v2 4/5] io_uring: add helper for parsing poll events

[Pavel Begunkov]

Isolate poll mask SQE parsing and preparations into a new function,
which will be reused shortly.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ce75a859a376..da5061f38fd6 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5291,6 +5291,20 @@ static int io_poll_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, __u64 sqe_addr,
 	return -EALREADY;
 }
 
+static __poll_t io_poll_parse_events(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
+				     unsigned int flags)
+{
+	u32 events;
+
+	events = READ_ONCE(sqe->poll32_events);
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+	events = swahw32(events);
+#endif
+	if (!(flags & IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI))
+		events |= EPOLLONESHOT;
+	return demangle_poll(events) | (events & (EPOLLEXCLUSIVE|EPOLLONESHOT));
+}
+
 static int io_poll_remove_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
 			       const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 {
@@ -5352,14 +5366,8 @@ static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe
 	if (flags & ~(IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI | IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS |
 			IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	events = READ_ONCE(sqe->poll32_events);
-#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
-	events = swahw32(events);
-#endif
-	if (!(flags & IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI))
-		events |= EPOLLONESHOT;
-	events = demangle_poll(events) |
-				(events & (EPOLLEXCLUSIVE|EPOLLONESHOT));
+
+	events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
 
 	if (flags & (IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS|IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA)) {
 		struct io_poll_update *poll_upd = &req->poll_update;
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH v2 5/5] io_uring: move poll update into remove not add

[Pavel Begunkov]

Having poll update function as a part of IORING_OP_POLL_ADD is not
great, we have to do hack around struct layouts and add some overhead in
the way of more popular POLL_ADD. Even more serious drawback is that
POLL_ADD requires file and always grabs it, and so poll update, which
doesn't need it.

Incorporate poll update into IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE instead of
IORING_OP_POLL_ADD. It also more consistent with timeout remove/update.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index da5061f38fd6..e9d60dee075e 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -501,11 +501,6 @@ struct io_poll_update {
 	bool				update_user_data;
 };
 
-struct io_poll_remove {
-	struct file			*file;
-	u64				addr;
-};
-
 struct io_close {
 	struct file			*file;
 	int				fd;
@@ -715,7 +710,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE_BIT,
 	REQ_F_REISSUE_BIT,
 	REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE_BIT,
-	REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE_BIT,
 	/* keep async read/write and isreg together and in order */
 	REQ_F_ASYNC_READ_BIT,
 	REQ_F_ASYNC_WRITE_BIT,
@@ -763,8 +757,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_REISSUE		= BIT(REQ_F_REISSUE_BIT),
 	/* don't attempt request reissue, see io_rw_reissue() */
 	REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE	= BIT(REQ_F_DONT_REISSUE_BIT),
-	/* switches between poll and poll update */
-	REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE	= BIT(REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE_BIT),
 	/* supports async reads */
 	REQ_F_ASYNC_READ	= BIT(REQ_F_ASYNC_READ_BIT),
 	/* supports async writes */
@@ -795,7 +787,6 @@ struct io_kiocb {
 		struct io_rw		rw;
 		struct io_poll_iocb	poll;
 		struct io_poll_update	poll_update;
-		struct io_poll_remove	poll_remove;
 		struct io_accept	accept;
 		struct io_sync		sync;
 		struct io_cancel	cancel;
@@ -5305,35 +5296,36 @@ static __poll_t io_poll_parse_events(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
 	return demangle_poll(events) | (events & (EPOLLEXCLUSIVE|EPOLLONESHOT));
 }
 
-static int io_poll_remove_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
+static int io_poll_update_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
 			       const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 {
+	struct io_poll_update *upd = &req->poll_update;
+	u32 flags;
+
 	if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->off || sqe->len || sqe->buf_index ||
-	    sqe->poll_events)
+	if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+	if (flags & ~(IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS | IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA |
+		      IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	/* meaningless without update */
+	if (flags == IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	req->poll_remove.addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Find a running poll command that matches one specified in sqe->addr,
- * and remove it if found.
- */
-static int io_poll_remove(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
-	int ret;
+	upd->old_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
+	upd->update_events = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS;
+	upd->update_user_data = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	ret = io_poll_cancel(ctx, req->poll_remove.addr, true);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
+	upd->new_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
+	if (!upd->update_user_data && upd->new_user_data)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (upd->update_events)
+		upd->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
+	else if (sqe->poll32_events)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (ret < 0)
-		req_set_fail_links(req);
-	__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -5356,40 +5348,22 @@ static void io_poll_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
 
 static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 {
-	u32 events, flags;
+	struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
+	u32 flags;
 
 	if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index)
+	if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index || sqe->off || sqe->addr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
-	if (flags & ~(IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI | IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS |
-			IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA))
+	if (flags & ~IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
-
-	if (flags & (IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS|IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA)) {
-		struct io_poll_update *poll_upd = &req->poll_update;
-
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE;
-		poll_upd->events = events;
-		poll_upd->old_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
-		poll_upd->update_events = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_EVENTS;
-		poll_upd->update_user_data = flags & IORING_POLL_UPDATE_USER_DATA;
-		if (poll_upd->update_user_data)
-			poll_upd->new_user_data = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
-	} else {
-		struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
-
-		poll->events = events;
-		if (sqe->off || sqe->addr)
-			return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -5415,7 +5389,7 @@ static int __io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	return ipt.error;
 }
 
-static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	struct io_kiocb *preq;
@@ -5429,6 +5403,12 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	if (!req->poll_update.update_events && !req->poll_update.update_user_data) {
+		completing = true;
+		ret = io_poll_remove_one(preq) ? 0 : -EALREADY;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Don't allow racy completion with singleshot, as we cannot safely
 	 * update those. For multishot, if we're racing with completion, just
@@ -5456,14 +5436,13 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	}
 	if (req->poll_update.update_user_data)
 		preq->user_data = req->poll_update.new_user_data;
-
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
 	/* complete update request, we're done with it */
 	io_req_complete(req, ret);
 
 	if (!completing) {
-		ret = __io_poll_add(preq);
+		ret = io_poll_add(preq, issue_flags);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			req_set_fail_links(preq);
 			io_req_complete(preq, ret);
@@ -5472,13 +5451,6 @@ static int io_poll_update(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
-{
-	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_POLL_UPDATE))
-		return __io_poll_add(req);
-	return io_poll_update(req);
-}
-
 static enum hrtimer_restart io_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
 {
 	struct io_timeout_data *data = container_of(timer,
@@ -5883,7 +5855,7 @@ static int io_req_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 	case IORING_OP_POLL_ADD:
 		return io_poll_add_prep(req, sqe);
 	case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
-		return io_poll_remove_prep(req, sqe);
+		return io_poll_update_prep(req, sqe);
 	case IORING_OP_FSYNC:
 		return io_fsync_prep(req, sqe);
 	case IORING_OP_SYNC_FILE_RANGE:
@@ -6114,7 +6086,7 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		ret = io_poll_add(req, issue_flags);
 		break;
 	case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
-		ret = io_poll_remove(req, issue_flags);
+		ret = io_poll_update(req, issue_flags);
 		break;
 	case IORING_OP_SYNC_FILE_RANGE:
 		ret = io_sync_file_range(req, issue_flags);
-- 
2.24.0

Re: [PATCH v2 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove

[Jens Axboe]

On 4/14/21 6:38 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 1-2 are are small improvements
> 
> The rest moves all poll update into IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE,
> see 5/5 for justification.
> 
> v2: fix io_poll_remove_one() on the remove request, not the one
> we cancel.

I like moving update into remove, imho it makes a lot more sense. Will
you be sending a test case patch for it too?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH v2 5.13 0/5] poll update into poll remove

[Pavel Begunkov]

On 14/04/2021 17:20, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/14/21 6:38 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> 1-2 are are small improvements
>>
>> The rest moves all poll update into IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE,
>> see 5/5 for justification.
>>
>> v2: fix io_poll_remove_one() on the remove request, not the one
>> we cancel.
> 
> I like moving update into remove, imho it makes a lot more sense. Will
> you be sending a test case patch for it too?

I was testing with your test case, 3 line change, can send it.

We definitely need a helper though. There was something for liburing
from Joakim, right?

-- 
Pavel Begunkov