From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 08/16] io_uring: optimise ctx referencing by requests
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 20:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99613fbe396e80777228cde39bbda1aa8938554e.1633373302.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Currenlty, we allocate one ctx reference per request at submission time
and put them at free. It's batched and not so expensive but it still
bloats the kernel, adds 2 function calls for rcu and adds some overhead
for request counting in io_free_batch_list().
Always keep one reference with a request, even when it's freed and in
io_uring request caches. There is extra work at ring exit / quiesce
paths, which now need to put all cached requests. io_ring_exit_work() is
already looping, so it's not a problem. Add hybrid-busy waiting to
io_ctx_quiesce() as well for now.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b465fba8a0dc..2b7f38df6a0c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ static void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req, long res,
io_put_task(req->task, 1);
wq_list_add_head(&req->comp_list, &ctx->locked_free_list);
ctx->locked_free_nr++;
- percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
}
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -1929,6 +1928,7 @@ static bool __io_alloc_req_refill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
ret = 1;
}
+ percpu_ref_get_many(&ctx->refs, ret);
for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
req = reqs[i];
@@ -1986,8 +1986,6 @@ static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
wq_list_add_head(&req->comp_list, &ctx->locked_free_list);
ctx->locked_free_nr++;
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-
- percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
}
static inline void io_remove_next_linked(struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -2276,7 +2274,7 @@ static void io_free_batch_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
__must_hold(&ctx->uring_lock)
{
struct task_struct *task = NULL;
- int task_refs = 0, ctx_refs = 0;
+ int task_refs = 0;
do {
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
@@ -2296,12 +2294,9 @@ static void io_free_batch_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
task_refs = 0;
}
task_refs++;
- ctx_refs++;
wq_stack_add_head(&req->comp_list, &ctx->submit_state.free_list);
} while (node);
- if (ctx_refs)
- percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, ctx_refs);
if (task)
io_put_task(task, task_refs);
}
@@ -7215,8 +7210,6 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
return 0;
/* make sure SQ entry isn't read before tail */
nr = min3(nr, ctx->sq_entries, entries);
- if (unlikely(!percpu_ref_tryget_many(&ctx->refs, nr)))
- return -EAGAIN;
io_get_task_refs(nr);
io_submit_state_start(&ctx->submit_state, nr);
@@ -7246,7 +7239,6 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr)
int unused = nr - ref_used;
current->io_uring->cached_refs += unused;
- percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, unused);
}
io_submit_state_end(ctx);
@@ -9167,6 +9159,7 @@ static void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static void io_req_caches_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_submit_state *state = &ctx->submit_state;
+ int nr = 0;
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
io_flush_cached_locked_reqs(ctx, state);
@@ -9178,7 +9171,10 @@ static void io_req_caches_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
node = wq_stack_extract(&state->free_list);
req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb, comp_list);
kmem_cache_free(req_cachep, req);
+ nr++;
}
+ if (nr)
+ percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, nr);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
}
@@ -9348,6 +9344,8 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
io_sq_thread_unpark(sqd);
}
+ io_req_caches_free(ctx);
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies, timeout))) {
/* there is little hope left, don't run it too often */
interval = HZ * 60;
@@ -10727,10 +10725,14 @@ static int io_ctx_quiesce(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
*/
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
do {
- ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->ref_comp);
- if (!ret)
+ ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&ctx->ref_comp, HZ);
+ if (ret) {
+ ret = min(0L, ret);
break;
+ }
+
ret = io_run_task_work_sig();
+ io_req_caches_free(ctx);
} while (ret >= 0);
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
--
2.33.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-04 19:02 [PATCH 00/16] squeeze more performance Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 01/16] io_uring: optimise kiocb layout Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 02/16] io_uring: add more likely/unlikely() annotations Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 03/16] io_uring: delay req queueing into compl-batch list Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 04/16] io_uring: optimise request allocation Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 05/16] io_uring: optimise INIT_WQ_LIST Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 06/16] io_uring: don't wake sqpoll in io_cqring_ev_posted Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 07/16] io_uring: merge CQ and poll waitqueues Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: mark cold functions Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 10/16] io_uring: optimise io_free_batch_list() Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 11/16] io_uring: control ->async_data with a REQ_F flag Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 12/16] io_uring: remove struct io_completion Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 13/16] io_uring: inline io_req_needs_clean() Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 14/16] io_uring: inline io_poll_complete Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 15/16] io_uring: correct fill events helpers types Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 16/16] io_uring: mark hot functions Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-04 20:19 ` [PATCH 00/16] squeeze more performance Jens Axboe
2021-10-04 20:33 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99613fbe396e80777228cde39bbda1aa8938554e.1633373302.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox