Re: [PATCH] io_uring: miscellaneous spelling fixes

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 6/3/25 3:20 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Correct spelling here and there as suggested by codespell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
> ---
>  io_uring/cancel.c    | 4 ++--
>  io_uring/io-wq.c     | 2 +-
>  io_uring/io_uring.c  | 8 ++++----
>  io_uring/notif.c     | 2 +-
>  io_uring/poll.c      | 2 +-
>  io_uring/rw.c        | 4 ++--
>  io_uring/tctx.h      | 2 +-
>  io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 2 +-
>  io_uring/waitid.c    | 2 +-
>  9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/cancel.c b/io_uring/cancel.c
> index 6d57602304df..6d46a0ac278a 100644
> --- a/io_uring/cancel.c
> +++ b/io_uring/cancel.c
> @@ -306,8 +306,8 @@ int io_sync_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Keep looking until we get -ENOENT. we'll get woken everytime
> -	 * every time a request completes and will retry the cancelation.
> +	 * Keep looking until we get -ENOENT. We'll get woken every
> +	 * time a request completes and will retry the cancellation.

Didn't look through all of these, but cancelation is a perfectly
valid spelling. That aside, I tend to not do spelling fixes unless
you're also needing to change the comment anyway. It's just noise
that can make patch backporting more difficult.

-- 
Jens Axboe