From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] io_uring: cmpxchg for poll arm refs release
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:51:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c95251624397ea6def568ff040cad2d7926fd51.1668963050.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 11/20/22 16:57, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Replace atomically substracting the ownership reference at the end of
> arming a poll with a cmpxchg. We try to release ownership by setting 0
> assuming that poll_refs didn't change while we were arming. If it did
> change, we keep the ownership and use it to queue a tw, which is fully
> capable to process all events and (even tolerates spurious wake ups).
>
> It's a bit more elegant as we reduce races b/w setting the cancellation
> flag and getting refs with this release, and with that we don't have to
> worry about any kinds of underflows. It's not the fastest path for
> polling. The performance difference b/w cmpxchg and atomic dec is
> usually negligible and it's not the fastest path.
Jens, can you add a couple of tags? Not a fix but the second patch
depends on it but applies cleanly even without 1/2, which may mess
things up.
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: aa43477b04025 ("io_uring: poll rework")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> io_uring/poll.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
> index 055632e9092a..1b78b527075d 100644
> --- a/io_uring/poll.c
> +++ b/io_uring/poll.c
> @@ -518,7 +518,6 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
> unsigned issue_flags)
> {
> struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
> - int v;
>
> INIT_HLIST_NODE(&req->hash_node);
> req->work.cancel_seq = atomic_read(&ctx->cancel_seq);
> @@ -586,11 +585,10 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
>
> if (ipt->owning) {
> /*
> - * Release ownership. If someone tried to queue a tw while it was
> - * locked, kick it off for them.
> + * Try to release ownership. If we see a change of state, e.g.
> + * poll was waken up, queue up a tw, it'll deal with it.
> */
> - v = atomic_dec_return(&req->poll_refs);
> - if (unlikely(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK))
> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&req->poll_refs, 1, 0) != 1)
> __io_poll_execute(req, 0);
> }
> return 0;
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-20 16:57 [PATCH v3 0/2] poll_refs armoring Pavel Begunkov
2022-11-20 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io_uring: cmpxchg for poll arm refs release Pavel Begunkov
2022-11-25 13:51 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-11-25 13:55 ` Jens Axboe
2022-11-20 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] io_uring: make poll refs more robust Pavel Begunkov
2022-11-21 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] poll_refs armoring Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox