From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC for-next 0/4] enable pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:33:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 10/18/22 19:47, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> This series implements bio pcpu caching for normal / IRQ-driven I/O
> extending REQ_ALLOC_CACHE currently limited to iopoll. The allocation side
> still only works from non-irq context, which is the reason it's not enabled
> by default, but turning it on for other users (e.g. filesystems) is
> as a matter of passing a flag.
Ooops, wrong version, will resend
> t/io_uring with an Optane SSD setup showed +7% for batches of 32 requests
> and +4.3% for batches of 8.
>
> IRQ, 128/32/32, cache off
> IOPS=59.08M, BW=28.84GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
> IOPS=59.30M, BW=28.96GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
> IOPS=59.97M, BW=29.28GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
> IOPS=59.92M, BW=29.26GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
> IOPS=59.81M, BW=29.20GiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
>
> IRQ, 128/32/32, cache on
> IOPS=64.05M, BW=31.27GiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
> IOPS=64.22M, BW=31.36GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
> IOPS=64.04M, BW=31.27GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
> IOPS=63.16M, BW=30.84GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
>
> IRQ, 32/8/8, cache off
> IOPS=50.60M, BW=24.71GiB/s, IOS/call=7/8
> IOPS=50.22M, BW=24.52GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
> IOPS=49.54M, BW=24.19GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
> IOPS=50.07M, BW=24.45GiB/s, IOS/call=7/7
> IOPS=50.46M, BW=24.64GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
>
> IRQ, 32/8/8, cache on
> IOPS=51.39M, BW=25.09GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
> IOPS=52.52M, BW=25.64GiB/s, IOS/call=7/8
> IOPS=52.57M, BW=25.67GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
> IOPS=52.58M, BW=25.67GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
> IOPS=52.61M, BW=25.69GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
>
> The main part is in patch 3. Would be great to take patch 1 separately
> for 6.1 for extra safety.
>
> Pavel Begunkov (4):
> bio: safeguard REQ_ALLOC_CACHE bio put
> bio: split pcpu cache part of bio_put into a helper
> block/bio: add pcpu caching for non-polling bio_put
> io_uring/rw: enable bio caches for IRQ rw
>
> block/bio.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> io_uring/rw.c | 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 18:47 [RFC for-next 0/4] enable pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 18:47 ` [RFC for-next 1/4] bio: safeguard REQ_ALLOC_CACHE bio put Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 18:47 ` [RFC for-next 2/4] bio: split pcpu cache part of bio_put into a helper Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 18:47 ` [RFC for-next 3/4] block/bio: add pcpu caching for non-polling bio_put Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 18:47 ` [RFC for-next 4/4] io_uring/rw: enable bio caches for IRQ rw Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 19:33 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox