From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.4]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C601D5174 for ; Fri, 16 May 2025 17:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747415752; cv=none; b=QmY2odTnWXHEUvuR/ffWeFWFXRX8MdTExjinT8lbC8sXx7QykgOwowuFYdRRv0KoKRnzomQkcKrQRorNp0n+JKiX+0nm4XWarbv2aaUDIqaGpSmWZRWoDDp3qvrDkXMsm93x+NBqLXWV1E2EZStf4vHjVlYhyATc3vrC6AwJCR4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747415752; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M6V1jV+g9SqfaZEcCjgdimRw9kqkqkiU4kIHIwizReM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=sgLhcY2n2zwjJ5UCt3LCUFtfuBFkPl4UCO8G+Wgf2ypMsuo76VP2wKxT3DRCFJkraws5SikWQQt0hgp+8yN4t9KUVkHoj3VZToe9SgOz0m3ca3QgTLUTaEI3Leb6lLo8nIgjWMdAGGsofDLd0TXRBuLLXhYXprQHjaXoNJIWz+U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=FXjRHd8o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="FXjRHd8o" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=Wm9FQu/ttTmV7Y01VNMky5fMxig3RI+DVbM+I+XZLHQ=; b=FXjRHd8o78tKrubuUXmQEjuoqeMZoyNSOYlMP5gQCN9lYivTi/DO6KG0mhT9Zl fZ5StKeye8UBYGKPDKyYi2nZPiVrWQxo/0JZRrNaixYjh56Yx9OZyapIXe2AM1gg c9DytrurP7Et1D7ibkNGBKNUqHriN1U65zdozog5d3bIs= Received: from [192.168.31.211] (unknown []) by gzsmtp4 (Coremail) with SMTP id PygvCgCXJm+Vcido7cCyAw--.4336S2; Sat, 17 May 2025 01:15:02 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <9eec6ea3-369f-408d-8eef-6788ad1d380f@163.com> Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 01:15:00 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v2] register: Remove deprecated io_uring_cqwait_reg_arg To: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <20250516091040.32374-1-haiyuewa@163.com> From: Haiyue Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID:PygvCgCXJm+Vcido7cCyAw--.4336S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj4ifHUBDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5kdl53xhzdqiywtou0bp/1tbiEQBPa2gna4mweQAAsR On 2025/5/16 22:04, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 5/16/25 3:09 AM, Haiyue Wang wrote: >> The opcode IORING_REGISTER_CQWAIT_REG and its argument io_uring_cqwait_reg_arg >> have been removed by [1] and [2]. >> >> And a more generic opcode IORING_REGISTER_MEM_REGION has been introduced by [3] >> since Linux 6.13. > > It's a shame to remove this (though of course it needs to go) and not > add the MEM_REGION replacement instead. Any interest in adding those > parts? Try to figure out the structure relationship in v3. >