public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>
To: "Pavel Begunkov" <[email protected]>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>, "Jens Axboe" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Gabriel Krisman Bertazi" <[email protected]>,
	"David Wei" <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/net: fix build warning for !CONFIG_COMPAT
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:58:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, at 14:49, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 2/27/25 13:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>        |                      ^~~
>> 
>> Since io_is_compat() turns into a compile-time 'false', the #ifdef
>> here is completely unnecessary, and removing it avoids the warning.
>
> I don't think __get_compat_msghdr() and other helpers are
> compiled for !COMPAT.

They are not defined without CONFIG_COMPAT. My point in the
message is that io_is_compat() turning into a compile-time
'false' value means that they also don't get called, because
compilers are really good at this type of dead code elimination.

> I'd just silence it like:
>
> if (io_is_compat(req->ctx)) {
> 	ret = -EFAULT;
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> 	...
> #endif CONFIG_COMPAT
> }

That seems even less readable. If you want to be explicit
about it, you could use

     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && io_is_compat(req->ctx)) {

to replace the #ifdef, but as I wrote in the patch
description, the compile-time check is really redundant
because io_is_compat() is meant to do exactly that.

       Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-27 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-27 13:20 [PATCH] io_uring/net: fix build warning for !CONFIG_COMPAT Arnd Bergmann
2025-02-27 13:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-27 13:58   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-02-28 12:14     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-27 14:54   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-27 14:57 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ef40a88-6243-4baf-8774-e4b72bfbb2f3@app.fastmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox