From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] improvements for multi-shot poll requests
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 20:04:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 10/28/21 20:01, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 10/28/21 19:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:38:46 +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>>> Echo_server codes can be clone from:
>>> https://codeup.openanolis.cn/codeup/storage/io_uring-echo-server.git
>>> branch is xiaoguangwang/io_uring_multishot. There is a simple HOWTO
>>> in this repository.
>>>
>>> Usage:
>>> In server: port 10016, 1000 connections, packet size 16 bytes, and
>>> enable fixed files.
>>> taskset -c 10 io_uring_echo_server_multi_shot -f -p 10016 -n 1000 -l 16
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [1/3] io_uring: refactor event check out of __io_async_wake()
>> commit: db3191671f970164d0074039d262d3f402a417eb
>> [2/3] io_uring: reduce frequent add_wait_queue() overhead for multi-shot poll request
>> commit: 34ced75ca1f63fac6148497971212583aa0f7a87
>> [3/3] io_uring: don't get completion_lock in io_poll_rewait()
>> commit: 57d9cc0f0dfe7453327c4c71ea22074419e2e800
>
> Jens, give me time to take a look first. There might be enough of bugs
> just because of sheer amount of new code. I also don't like the amount
> of overhead it adds to generic paths, hopefully unnecessary
Hmm, I mixed them up. This one is simpler, I was looking at the other one
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 5:38 [PATCH v3 0/3] improvements for multi-shot poll requests Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-25 5:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] io_uring: refactor event check out of __io_async_wake() Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-25 9:35 ` Praveen Kumar
2021-10-25 5:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] io_uring: reduce frequent add_wait_queue() overhead for multi-shot poll request Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-28 19:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-29 2:57 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-29 10:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-29 13:37 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-29 13:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-29 14:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-29 14:34 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-25 5:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] io_uring: don't get completion_lock in io_poll_rewait() Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-28 19:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-29 5:59 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-10-28 18:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] improvements for multi-shot poll requests Jens Axboe
2021-10-29 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-28 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-28 19:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-28 19:04 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox