From: Nadav Amit <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>,
Peter Xu <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/13] fs/userfaultfd: kmem-cache for wait-queue objects
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:51:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> On Nov 28, 2020, at 4:45 PM, Nadav Amit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Nadav Amit <[email protected]>
>
> Allocating work-queue objects on the stack has usually negative
> performance side-effects. First, it is hard to ensure alignment to
> cache-lines without increasing the stack size. Second, it might cause
> false sharing. Third, it is more likely to encounter TLB misses as
> objects are more likely reside on different pages.
>
> Allocate userfaultfd wait-queue objects on the heap using kmem-cache for
> better performance.
Err… The wait-queue objects are still on the stack in some cases that I
missed. Will fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-29 0:45 [RFC PATCH 00/13] fs/userfaultfd: support iouring and polling Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] fs/userfaultfd: fix wrong error code on WP & !VM_MAYWRITE Nadav Amit
2020-12-01 21:22 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-12-21 19:01 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] fs/userfaultfd: fix wrong file usage with iouring Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] selftests/vm/userfaultfd: wake after copy failure Nadav Amit
2020-12-21 19:28 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-21 19:51 ` Nadav Amit
2020-12-21 20:52 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-21 20:54 ` Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] fs/userfaultfd: simplify locks in userfaultfd_ctx_read Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] fs/userfaultfd: introduce UFFD_FEATURE_POLL Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] iov_iter: support atomic copy_page_from_iter_iovec() Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] fs/userfaultfd: support read_iter to use io_uring Nadav Amit
2020-11-30 18:20 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-30 19:23 ` Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] fs/userfaultfd: complete reads asynchronously Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] fs/userfaultfd: use iov_iter for copy/zero Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] fs/userfaultfd: add write_iter() interface Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] fs/userfaultfd: complete write asynchronously Nadav Amit
2020-12-02 7:12 ` Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] fs/userfaultfd: kmem-cache for wait-queue objects Nadav Amit
2020-11-30 19:51 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] selftests/vm/userfaultfd: iouring and polling tests Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox