From: Jackie Liu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix dead-hung for non-iter fixed rw
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:43:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> 2019年11月25日 01:52,Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> 写道:
>
> On 24/11/2019 20:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/24/19 1:58 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> Read/write requests to devices without implemented read/write_iter
>>> using fixed buffers causes general protection fault, which totally
>>> hangs a machine.
>>>
>>> io_import_fixed() initialises iov_iter with bvec, but loop_rw_iter()
>>> accesses it as iovec, so dereferencing random address.
>>>
>>> kmap() page by page in this case
>>
>> This looks good to me, much cleaner/simpler. I've added a few pipe fixed
>> buffer tests to liburing as well. Didn't crash for me, but obvious
>> garbage coming out. I've flagged this for stable as well.
>>
> The problem I have is that __user pointer is meant to be checked
> for not being a kernel address. I suspect, it could fail in some
> device, which double checks the pointer after vfs (e.g. using access_ok()).
> Am I wrong? Not a fault at least...
>
> #define access_ok(...) __range_not_ok(addr, user_addr_max());
>
> BTW, is there anybody testing it for non x86-64 arch?
>
I have some aarch64 platform, What test do you want me to do?
--
Jackie Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[email protected]>
2019-11-24 8:58 ` [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix dead-hung for non-iter fixed rw Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-24 17:10 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-24 17:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-25 0:43 ` Jackie Liu [this message]
2019-11-25 2:38 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-25 3:33 ` Jackie Liu
2019-11-25 3:47 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-25 10:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-25 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-25 10:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BEEAB31A-9949-4375-93EF-0D55D8100045@byteisland.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox