From: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
To: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: "Kanchan Joshi" <[email protected]>,
"Jens Axboe" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
"Pavel Begunkov" <[email protected]>,
"Ming Lei" <[email protected]>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <[email protected]>,
"Pankaj Raghav" <[email protected]>,
"Javier González" <[email protected]>,
"Anuj Gupta" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] nvme: wire-up support for async-passthru on char-device.
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:19:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+1E3rJXrUnmc08Zy3yO=0mGJv1q0CaJez4eUDnTpaJcSh_1FQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:32 AM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:55:05PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> > > Something like this (untested) patch should help to separate
> > > the much better:
> >
> > It does, thanks. But the only thing is - it would be good to support
> > vectored-passthru too (i.e. NVME_IOCTL_IO64_CMD_VEC) for this path.
> > For the new opcode "NVME_URING_CMD_IO" , either we can change the
> > cmd-structure or flag-based handling so that vectored-io is supported.
> > Or we introduce NVME_URING_CMD_IO_VEC also for that.
> > Which one do you prefer?
>
> I agree vectored I/O support is useful.
>
> Do we even need to support the non-vectored case?
Would be good to have, I suppose.
Helps keeping it simple when user-space wants to use a single-buffer
(otherwise it must carry psuedo iovec for that too).
> Also I think we'll want admin command passthrough on /dev/nvmeX as
> well, but I'm fine solving the other items first.
>
> > > +static int nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata(struct bio *bio, int ret,
> > > + void __user *meta_ubuf)
> > > +{
> > > + struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
> > > +
> > > + if (bip) {
> > > + void *meta = bvec_virt(bip->bip_vec);
> > > +
> > > + if (!ret && bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN &&
> > > + copy_to_user(meta_ubuf, meta, bip->bip_vec->bv_len))
> > > + ret = -EFAULT;
> >
> > Maybe it is better to move the check "bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_DRV_IN" outside.
> > Because this can be common, and for that we can avoid entering into
> > the function call itself (i.e. nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata).
>
> Function calls are pretty cheap, but I'll see what we can do. I'll try
> to come up with a prep series to refactor the passthrough support for
> easier adding of the io_uring in the next days.
In that case we will base the newer version on its top.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220401110829epcas5p39f3cf4d3f6eb8a5c59794787a2b72b15@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110831epcas5p403bacabe8f7e5262356fdc1a2e66df90@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 1/5] io_uring: add support for 128-byte SQEs Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110833epcas5p18e828a307a646cef5b7aa429be4396e0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 2/5] fs: add file_operations->async_cmd() Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110834epcas5p4d1e5e8d1beb1a6205d670bbcb932bf77@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 3/5] io_uring: add infra and support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 8:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-05 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 6:37 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 15:14 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 16:27 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110836epcas5p37bd59ab5a48cf77ca3ac05052a164b0b@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 4/5] io_uring: add support for big-cqe Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:04 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220401110838epcas5p2c1a2e776923dfe5bf65a3e7946820150@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-01 11:03 ` [RFC 5/5] nvme: wire-up support for async-passthru on char-device Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-04 14:25 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-05 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 15:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-05 15:49 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2022-04-06 5:20 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-06 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-23 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 17:38 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-29 13:16 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-04-04 7:21 ` [RFC 0/5] big-cqe based uring-passthru Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-05 15:37 ` Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+1E3rJXrUnmc08Zy3yO=0mGJv1q0CaJez4eUDnTpaJcSh_1FQ@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox