From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01D7C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229738AbiDFHFf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 03:05:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40036 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1358451AbiDFGPb (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 02:15:31 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2f.google.com (mail-oa1-x2f.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EAF497CCB for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2f.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-deb9295679so1794689fac.6 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 22:20:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l9+/yCBOkTtbp5l+BKTxdkzgNWz3+13PB5ObVpgIN9E=; b=I7Izv+wp6ICDb7mI38AwuHhe5dwXif0rfGr2Hjv999l3tq946mdQCUX5KDMy4GBm1d R2R4NrMcXrZSImZBvZj0Kq0ufHsMuiMGSkvm41mS8GL7aPJUE7ffi+VlRJte3B7gEzol VM6NNi9Tnu3MelDu6ixUrnDKREHSy7jj1V167N7majhuSd+ogSb5O6Pj+clwWf5qYV2T RGKWSXX+oF8XfN5riAnfTWiYnzX2mP8afPBKfmdQK+5ZjjMxvC/9OkCrOjCl/HJc7PM1 M63y3OI6/eh8DtaXftYnx9d9/QaI2AzYAfkLwh2nWLIyb4nLRDuXbVGDXGJfOPGi2xl3 vIhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l9+/yCBOkTtbp5l+BKTxdkzgNWz3+13PB5ObVpgIN9E=; b=GPnbm3uj64GEsr7olO272rqvaWc6It8X6uVEUl6dw9oWFH4Zo8WTXLkMwlmTL7dRS+ FPWc6duHpjc+tYVk8y44ZfyjhvVIKX7RTotC1PZl13XEkIs26dv6fZEyyHen93iCgl+3 HdBttw489FG84vMKJPgGpKOAQBLuaYEZu5jkmJRYxpdY8MagB+vtgvYE/2SPxjEdswrD OZT8jKlxgRHflPQozO0c9SSokEOFx4x5XnsEfKihr5A82zskDl/ACbE6fLvi6maTJmnp TkYFYJhvuXablZdz4P9S0EFNoRJio+iY7b06Ki2CVOI3Rk8UKbJtreiBMybKQabutKKz iZbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329IIR3nZovZljTuoTdIYsrOh27SrxcdniUXOH84vwxASllOgsw R1fdslR47DfQfNVqMDSMyJmhGQOrA+BT/QTQHAI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0/I69tdKuJDxigBoP3AuSaTFMWHsdn/qNZukJRBdrFbQrK5Om31iXu3Aez6v38D8oDQ1TQV860NcC4Y6Gz0U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:d18b:b0:d9:f452:be90 with SMTP id a11-20020a056870d18b00b000d9f452be90mr3118492oac.15.1649222439368; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 22:20:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220401110310.611869-1-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20220401110310.611869-6-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20220404072016.GD444@lst.de> <20220405060224.GE23698@lst.de> In-Reply-To: From: Kanchan Joshi Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:50:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] nvme: wire-up support for async-passthru on char-device. To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Kanchan Joshi , Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Pavel Begunkov , Ming Lei , Luis Chamberlain , Pankaj Raghav , =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Gonz=C3=A1lez?= , Anuj Gupta Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org > > Also I think we'll want admin command passthrough on /dev/nvmeX as > > well, but I'm fine solving the other items first. Sure, will add that in the second round. Should be fairly simple as we can reuse io-command work anyway. > > > > +static int nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata(struct bio *bio, int ret, > > > > + void __user *meta_ubuf) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio); > > > > + > > > > + if (bip) { > > > > + void *meta = bvec_virt(bip->bip_vec); > > > > + > > > > + if (!ret && bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN && > > > > + copy_to_user(meta_ubuf, meta, bip->bip_vec->bv_len)) > > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > > > > Maybe it is better to move the check "bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_DRV_IN" outside. > > > Because this can be common, and for that we can avoid entering into > > > the function call itself (i.e. nvme_ioctl_finish_metadata). > > > > Function calls are pretty cheap, but I'll see what we can do. I'll try > > to come up with a prep series to refactor the passthrough support for > > easier adding of the io_uring in the next days. > > In that case we will base the newer version on its top. But if it saves some cycles for you, and also the travel from nvme to linux-block tree - I can carry that refactoring as a prep patch in this series. Your call.