From: Constantine Gavrilov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: io_uring_enter() with opcode IORING_OP_RECV ignores MSG_WAITALL in msg_flags
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:12:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAL3td2kwj4Gf-q1zpVUpSgNKFKwXq0biuu7TF6um8ZAQaQo2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR15MB2603162E692B5A68A4FD0A6FFA189@DM6PR15MB2603.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
> From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 14:19
> To: Constantine Gavrilov <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: io_uring_enter() with opcode IORING_OP_RECV ignores MSG_WAITALL in msg_flags
>
> On 3/23/22 4:31 AM, Constantine Gavrilov wrote:
> > I get partial receives on TCP socket, even though I specify
> > MSG_WAITALL with IORING_OP_RECV opcode. Looking at tcpdump in
> > wireshark, I see entire reassambled packet (+4k), so it is not a
> > disconnect. The MTU is smaller than 4k.
> >
> > From the mailing list history, looks like this was discussed before
> > and it seems the fix was supposed to be in. Can someone clarify the
> > expected behavior?
> >
> > I do not think rsvmsg() has this issue.
>
> Do you have a test case? I added the io-uring list, that's the
> appropriate forum for this kind of discussion.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
Yes, I have a real test case. I cannot share it vebratim, but with a
little effort I believe I can come with a simple code of
client/server.
It seems the issue shall be directly seen from the implementation, but
if it is not so, I will provide a sample code.
Forgot to mention that the issue is seen of Fedora kernel version
5.16.12-200.fc35.x86_64.
--
It seems the issue shall be directly seen from the implementation, but
if it is not so, I will provide a sample code.
Forgot to mention that the issue is seen of Fedora kernel version
5.16.12-200.fc35.x86_64.
--
----------------------------------------
Constantine Gavrilov
Storage Architect
Master Inventor
Tel-Aviv IBM Storage Lab
1 Azrieli Center, Tel-Aviv
----------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BYAPR15MB260078EC747F0F0183D1BB1BFA189@BYAPR15MB2600.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
2022-03-23 12:19 ` io_uring_enter() with opcode IORING_OP_RECV ignores MSG_WAITALL in msg_flags Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 12:32 ` Constantine Gavrilov
2022-03-23 12:38 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <DM6PR15MB2603162E692B5A68A4FD0A6FFA189@DM6PR15MB2603.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
2022-03-23 13:12 ` Constantine Gavrilov [this message]
2022-03-23 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-23 19:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAL3td2kwj4Gf-q1zpVUpSgNKFKwXq0biuu7TF6um8ZAQaQo2Q@mail.gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox