From: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
To: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>, Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>, Jan Kara <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 12:30:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5n-6AjPuMj6sH0T2uSy97LMy3qkimUT13S2Fi-p-6Nug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, at 17:36, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 7:59 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024, at 04:39, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 09:40 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, both Linus and Christian hates introducing a new AT_ flag for
> >> >> > this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This patch just makes statx(fd, NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) behave
> >> >> > like
> >> >> > statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) instead. NULL avoids the
> >> >> > performance
> >> >> > issue and it's also audit-able by seccomp BPF.
> >> >> To be honest, I still want to restore __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT. Because
> >> >> even if statx() becomes audit-able, it is still blacklisted now.
> >> >
> >> > Then patch the sandbox to allow it.
> >> >
> >> > The sandbox **must** be patched anyway or it'll be broken on all 32-bit
> >> > systems after 2037. [Unless they'll unsupport all 32-bit systems before
> >> > 2037.]
> >>
> >> More importantly, the sandbox won't be able to support any 32-bit
> >> targets that support running after 2037, regardless of how long
> >> the sandbox supports them: if you turn off COMPAT_32BIT_TIME today
> >> in order to be sure those don't get called by accident, the
> >> fallback is immediately broken.
> > Would you mind if I restore newstat for LoongArch64 even if this patch exist?
>
> I still prefer not add newstat back: it's easier to
> get applications to correctly implement the statx() code
> path if there are more architectures that only have that.
Yes, we need statx-only architecures to improve statx(), and so this
patch got upstream. But I'm considering bidirectional compatibility,
which means the kernel should work with future patched and existing
un-patched sandboxes. So I think now is the correct time to add
newstat back for LoongArch --- statx() has been improved, and existing
applications want to work on LoongArch.
Huacai
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 11:00 [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: add CLASS fd_raw Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 12:22 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:13 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 13:24 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 14:09 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-25 14:58 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30 1:40 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-30 2:39 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30 13:18 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-01 11:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-02 15:36 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-02 17:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03 4:30 ` Huacai Chen [this message]
2024-07-03 8:45 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 9:35 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-03 10:07 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 16:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 17:30 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:14 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 18:39 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:33 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03 19:55 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 17:11 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 2:38 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-04 3:23 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 4:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 5:55 ` Florian Weimer
2024-07-04 6:02 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-01 4:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01 6:46 ` Xi Ruoyao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAhV-H5n-6AjPuMj6sH0T2uSy97LMy3qkimUT13S2Fi-p-6Nug@mail.gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox