public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
To: Hristo Venev <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Necip Fazil Yildiran <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix sq array offset calculation
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:16:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+Y36NYmsn1nA16YFzLDU_Gt1xWZF+ZXvbJr9y-0qqP+DQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 5:52 PM Hristo Venev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 17:31 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Looking at the code more, I am not sure how it may not corrupt
> > memory.
> > There definitely should be some combinations where accessing
> > sq_entries*sizeof(u32) more memory won't be OK.
> > May be worth adding a test that allocates all possible sizes for
> > sq/cq
> > and fills both rings.
>
> The layout (after the fix) is roughly as follows:
>
> 1. struct io_rings - ~192 bytes, maybe 256
> 2. cqes - (32 << n) bytes
> 3. sq_array - (4 << n) bytes
>
> The bug was that the sq_array was offset by (4 << n) bytes. I think
> issues can only occur when
>
>     PAGE_ALIGN(192 + (32 << n) + (4 << n) + (4 << n))
>     !=
>     PAGE_ALIGN(192 + (32 << n) + (4 << n))
>
> It looks like this never happens. We got lucky.

Interesting. CQ entries are larger and we have at least that many of
them as SQ entries. I guess this + power-of-2-pages can make it never
overflow.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-11 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-11  9:31 [PATCH] io_uring: fix sq array offset calculation Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-11  9:37 ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 15:15 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:31   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-11 15:36     ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:47       ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:52     ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 15:55       ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:56       ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 16:16       ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2020-07-17 13:48         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-17 14:05           ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 14:08             ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 14:08             ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACT4Y+Y36NYmsn1nA16YFzLDU_Gt1xWZF+ZXvbJr9y-0qqP+DQ@mail.gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox