From: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
Subject: shutdown not affecting connection?
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD-J=zaQ2hCBKYCgsK8ehhzF4WgB0=1uMgG=p1BQ1V1YsN37_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi
I've been trying to make sense of some weird behavior with the seastar
implementation of io_uring, and started to suspect a bug in io_uring's
connect.
The situation is as follows:
- A connect() call is issued (and in the backend I can choose if I use
uring or not)
- The connection is supposed to take a while to establish.
- I call shutdown on the file descriptor
If io_uring is not used:
- connect() starts by returning EINPROGRESS as expected, and after
the shutdown the file descriptor is finally made ready for epoll. I
call getsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR), and see the error (104)
if io_uring is used:
- if the SQE has the IOSQE_ASYNC flag on, connect() never returns.
- if the SQE *does not* have the IOSQE_ASYNC flag on, then most of the
time the test works as intended and connect() returns 104, but
occasionally it hangs too. Note that, seastar may choose not to call
io_uring_enter immediately and batch sqes.
Sounds like some kind of race?
I know C++ probably stinks like the devil for you guys, but if you are
curious to see the code, this fails one of our unit tests:
https://github.com/scylladb/seastar/blob/master/tests/unit/connect_test.cc
See test_connection_attempt_is_shutdown
(above is the master seastar tree, not including the io_uring implementation)
Please let me know if this rings a bell and if there is anything I
should be verifying here
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-08 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-08 13:55 Glauber Costa [this message]
2020-02-08 14:26 ` shutdown not affecting connection? Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-08 18:42 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 18:48 ` Avi Kivity
2020-02-08 18:57 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 20:20 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 20:28 ` Avi Kivity
2020-02-08 20:43 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 18:48 ` Andres Freund
2020-02-08 18:54 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD-J=zaQ2hCBKYCgsK8ehhzF4WgB0=1uMgG=p1BQ1V1YsN37_A@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox