From: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/5] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:20:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZorM+T+-Pk4hbsFk_+kJFYMAEaAkLompYdM2UWFucOWsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7TmrB4_aBnZdFbo@kbusch-mbp>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:59 AM Keith Busch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:38:54PM -0800, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 7:45 AM Keith Busch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > +
> > > + nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
> >
> > Is this guaranteed to match the number of bvecs in the request?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Wouldn't the number of physical segments depend on how the block
> > device splits the bvecs?
>
> Also yes.
>
> >lo_rw_aio() uses rq_for_each_bvec() to count
> > the number of bvecs, for example.
>
> Hm, that seems unnecessary. The request's nr_phys_segments is
> initialized to the number of bvecs rather than page segments, so it can
> be used instead of recounting them from a given struct request.
>
> The initial number of physical segments for a request is set in
> bio_split_rw_at(), which uses bio_for_each_bvec(). That's what
> rq_for_each_bvec would use, too. The same is used for any bio's that get
> merged into the bio.
Okay, thanks for verifying!
Best,
Caleb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 15:43 [PATCHv3 0/5] ublk zero-copy support Keith Busch
2025-02-14 15:43 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] io_uring: move fixed buffer import to issue path Keith Busch
2025-02-18 20:32 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-14 15:43 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs Keith Busch
2025-02-14 20:38 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-18 19:59 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 20:20 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-02-14 15:43 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] ublk: zc register/unregister bvec Keith Busch
2025-02-14 15:43 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] io_uring: add abstraction for buf_table rsrc data Keith Busch
2025-02-14 15:43 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] io_uring: cache nodes and mapped buffers Keith Busch
2025-02-15 2:22 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-16 22:43 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-18 20:12 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 20:45 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-18 20:09 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 20:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-18 21:12 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADUfDZorM+T+-Pk4hbsFk_+kJFYMAEaAkLompYdM2UWFucOWsA@mail.gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox