public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, axboe@kernel.dk, bschubert@ddn.com,
	 asml.silence@gmail.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	xiaobing.li@samsung.com,  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 23/30] io_uring/rsrc: split io_buffer_register_request() logic
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 00:41:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZp9u8D8shxK1BQ=O4cMWeE7w4wrvfY7Xdr0=_vAEgvJZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251203003526.2889477-24-joannelkoong@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 4:37 PM Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Split the main initialization logic in io_buffer_register_request() into
> a helper function.
>
> This is a preparatory patch for supporting kernel-populated buffers in
> fuse io-uring, which will be reusing this logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> ---
>  io_uring/rsrc.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> index 59cafe63d187..18abba6f6b86 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> @@ -941,63 +941,79 @@ int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct request *rq,
> -                              void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
> -                              unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static int io_buffer_init(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr_bvecs,

Consider adding "kernel" somewhere in the name to distinguish this
from the userspace registered buffer initialization

> +                         unsigned int total_bytes, u8 dir,
> +                         void (*release)(void *), void *priv,
> +                         unsigned int index)
>  {
>         struct io_rsrc_data *data = &ctx->buf_table;
> -       struct req_iterator rq_iter;
>         struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
>         struct io_rsrc_node *node;
> -       struct bio_vec bv;
> -       unsigned int nr_bvecs = 0;
> -       int ret = 0;
>
> -       io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> -       if (index >= data->nr) {
> -               ret = -EINVAL;
> -               goto unlock;
> -       }
> +       if (index >= data->nr)
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         index = array_index_nospec(index, data->nr);
>
> -       if (data->nodes[index]) {
> -               ret = -EBUSY;
> -               goto unlock;
> -       }
> +       if (data->nodes[index])
> +               return -EBUSY;
>
>         node = io_rsrc_node_alloc(ctx, IORING_RSRC_BUFFER);
> -       if (!node) {
> -               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -               goto unlock;
> -       }
> +       if (!node)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       /*
> -        * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
> -        * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
> -        */
> -       imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq));
> +       imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, nr_bvecs);
>         if (!imu) {
>                 kfree(node);
> -               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -               goto unlock;
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>         }
>
>         imu->ubuf = 0;
> -       imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
> +       imu->len = total_bytes;
>         imu->acct_pages = 0;
>         imu->folio_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> +       imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
>         refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
>         imu->release = release;
> -       imu->priv = rq;
> +       imu->priv = priv;
>         imu->is_kbuf = true;
> -       imu->dir = 1 << rq_data_dir(rq);
> +       imu->dir = 1 << dir;
> +
> +       node->buf = imu;
> +       data->nodes[index] = node;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct request *rq,
> +                              void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
> +                              unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +       struct req_iterator rq_iter;
> +       struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
> +       struct bio_vec bv;
> +       unsigned int nr_bvecs;
> +       unsigned int total_bytes;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
> +        * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
> +        */
> +       nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
> +       total_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(rq);

These could be initialized before io_ring_submit_lock()

> +       ret = io_buffer_init(ctx, nr_bvecs, total_bytes, rq_data_dir(rq), release, rq,
> +                            index);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto unlock;
>
> +       imu = ctx->buf_table.nodes[index]->buf;

It would be nice to avoid all these additional dereferences. Could
io_buffer_init() return the struct io_mapped_ubuf *, using ERR_PTR()
to return any error code?

Best,
Caleb

> +       nr_bvecs = 0;
>         rq_for_each_bvec(bv, rq, rq_iter)
>                 imu->bvec[nr_bvecs++] = bv;
>         imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
>
> -       node->buf = imu;
> -       data->nodes[index] = node;
>  unlock:
>         io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
>         return ret;
> --
> 2.47.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-07  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-03  0:34 [PATCH v1 00/30] fuse/io-uring: add kernel-managed buffer rings and zero-copy Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:34 ` [PATCH v1 01/30] io_uring/kbuf: refactor io_buf_pbuf_register() logic into generic helpers Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:34 ` [PATCH v1 02/30] io_uring/kbuf: rename io_unregister_pbuf_ring() to io_unregister_buf_ring() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:34 ` [PATCH v1 03/30] io_uring/kbuf: add support for kernel-managed buffer rings Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:34 ` [PATCH v1 04/30] io_uring/kbuf: add mmap " Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 05/30] io_uring/kbuf: support kernel-managed buffer rings in buffer selection Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/30] io_uring/kbuf: add buffer ring pinning/unpinning Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  4:13   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-04 18:41     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 07/30] io_uring/rsrc: add fixed buffer table pinning/unpinning Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  4:49   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03 22:52     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-04  1:24       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-04 20:07         ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-10  3:35           ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-13  6:07             ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 08/30] io_uring/kbuf: add recycling for pinned kernel managed buffer rings Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 09/30] io_uring: add io_uring_cmd_import_fixed_index() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03 21:43   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-04 18:56     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-05 16:56       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-05 23:28         ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-11  2:57           ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 10/30] io_uring/kbuf: add io_uring_is_kmbuf_ring() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 11/30] io_uring/kbuf: return buffer id in buffer selection Joanne Koong
2025-12-03 21:53   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-04 19:22     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-04 21:57       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 12/30] io_uring/kbuf: export io_ring_buffer_select() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 13/30] io_uring/cmd: set selected buffer index in __io_uring_cmd_done() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 14/30] io_uring: add release callback for ring death Joanne Koong
2025-12-03 22:25   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03 22:54     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 15/30] fuse: refactor io-uring logic for getting next fuse request Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 16/30] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying to ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 17/30] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying from ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 18/30] fuse: use enum types for header copying Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 19/30] fuse: refactor setting up copy state for payload copying Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 20/30] fuse: support buffer copying for kernel addresses Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 21/30] fuse: add io-uring kernel-managed buffer ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 22/30] io_uring/rsrc: refactor io_buffer_register_bvec()/io_buffer_unregister_bvec() Joanne Koong
2025-12-07  8:33   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-13  5:11     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-16  3:07       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 23/30] io_uring/rsrc: split io_buffer_register_request() logic Joanne Koong
2025-12-07  8:41   ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-12-13  5:24     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-15 17:09       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 24/30] io_uring/rsrc: Allow buffer release callback to be optional Joanne Koong
2025-12-07  8:42   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 25/30] io_uring/rsrc: add io_buffer_register_bvec() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 26/30] io_uring/rsrc: export io_buffer_unregister Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 27/30] fuse: rename fuse_set_zero_arg0() to fuse_zero_in_arg0() Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 28/30] fuse: enforce op header for every payload reply Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 29/30] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring Joanne Koong
2025-12-03  0:35 ` [PATCH v1 30/30] docs: fuse: add io-uring bufring and zero-copy documentation Joanne Koong
2025-12-13  7:52   ` Askar Safin
2025-12-15  3:18     ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-13  9:14 ` [PATCH v1 00/30] fuse/io-uring: add kernel-managed buffer rings and zero-copy Askar Safin
2025-12-15  3:24   ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADUfDZp9u8D8shxK1BQ=O4cMWeE7w4wrvfY7Xdr0=_vAEgvJZQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=xiaobing.li@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox