public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	 [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected],  Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 06/11] io_uring/rw: move fixed buffer import to issue path
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:57:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZqmVX6Vn9euU0v9AvYGdU6BPtR7vEDBgss_8Hiv7WHuZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:31 PM Keith Busch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
>
> Registered buffers may depend on a linked command, which makes the prep
> path too early to import. Move to the issue path when the node is
> actually needed like all the other users of fixed buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
> ---
>  io_uring/opdef.c |  8 ++++----
>  io_uring/rw.c    | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  io_uring/rw.h    |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/opdef.c b/io_uring/opdef.c
> index 9344534780a02..5369ae33b5ad9 100644
> --- a/io_uring/opdef.c
> +++ b/io_uring/opdef.c
> @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ const struct io_issue_def io_issue_defs[] = {
>                 .iopoll                 = 1,
>                 .iopoll_queue           = 1,
>                 .async_size             = sizeof(struct io_async_rw),
> -               .prep                   = io_prep_read_fixed,
> -               .issue                  = io_read,
> +               .prep                   = io_prep_read,
> +               .issue                  = io_read_fixed,
>         },
>         [IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED] = {
>                 .needs_file             = 1,
> @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ const struct io_issue_def io_issue_defs[] = {
>                 .iopoll                 = 1,
>                 .iopoll_queue           = 1,
>                 .async_size             = sizeof(struct io_async_rw),
> -               .prep                   = io_prep_write_fixed,
> -               .issue                  = io_write,
> +               .prep                   = io_prep_write,
> +               .issue                  = io_write_fixed,
>         },
>         [IORING_OP_POLL_ADD] = {
>                 .needs_file             = 1,
> diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
> index db24bcd4c6335..5f37fa48fdd9b 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rw.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rw.c
> @@ -348,33 +348,20 @@ int io_prep_writev(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>         return io_prep_rwv(req, sqe, ITER_SOURCE);
>  }
>
> -static int io_prep_rw_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
> -                           int ddir)
> +static int io_init_rw_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags, int ddir)
>  {
>         struct io_rw *rw = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_rw);
> -       struct io_async_rw *io;
> +       struct io_async_rw *io = req->async_data;
>         int ret;
>
> -       ret = io_prep_rw(req, sqe, ddir, false);
> -       if (unlikely(ret))
> -               return ret;
> +       if (io->bytes_done)
> +               return 0;
>
> -       io = req->async_data;
>         ret = io_import_reg_buf(req, &io->iter, rw->addr, rw->len, ddir, 0);

Shouldn't this be passing issue_flags here?

Best,
Caleb



>         iov_iter_save_state(&io->iter, &io->iter_state);
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -int io_prep_read_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> -{
> -       return io_prep_rw_fixed(req, sqe, ITER_DEST);
> -}
> -
> -int io_prep_write_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> -{
> -       return io_prep_rw_fixed(req, sqe, ITER_SOURCE);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Multishot read is prepared just like a normal read/write request, only
>   * difference is that we set the MULTISHOT flag.
> @@ -1138,6 +1125,28 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>         }
>  }
>
> +int io_read_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = io_init_rw_fixed(req, issue_flags, ITER_DEST);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return io_read(req, issue_flags);
> +}
> +
> +int io_write_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = io_init_rw_fixed(req, issue_flags, ITER_SOURCE);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return io_write(req, issue_flags);
> +}
> +
>  void io_rw_fail(struct io_kiocb *req)
>  {
>         int res;
> diff --git a/io_uring/rw.h b/io_uring/rw.h
> index a45e0c71b59d6..42a491d277273 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rw.h
> +++ b/io_uring/rw.h
> @@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ struct io_async_rw {
>         );
>  };
>
> -int io_prep_read_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
> -int io_prep_write_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>  int io_prep_readv(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>  int io_prep_writev(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>  int io_prep_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>  int io_prep_write(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>  int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>  int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
> +int io_read_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
> +int io_write_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>  void io_readv_writev_cleanup(struct io_kiocb *req);
>  void io_rw_fail(struct io_kiocb *req);
>  void io_req_rw_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw);
> --
> 2.43.5
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 21:31 [PATCHv5 00/11] ublk zero copy support Keith Busch
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 01/11] io_uring/rsrc: remove redundant check for valid imu Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:37   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:13   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 02/11] io_uring/nop: reuse req->buf_index Keith Busch
2025-02-24 23:30   ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-25  0:02     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:43   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:13   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 03/11] io_uring/net: reuse req->buf_index for sendzc Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:44   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:14   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 04/11] io_uring/nvme: pass issue_flags to io_uring_cmd_import_fixed() Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:52   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 05/11] io_uring: combine buffer lookup and import Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:55   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 06/11] io_uring/rw: move fixed buffer import to issue path Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:26   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:57   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 20:57   ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-02-25 21:16     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 07/11] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:40   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 17:32     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 22:47       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 22:55         ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 14:00   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:05     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 20:58   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 08/11] nvme: map uring_cmd data even if address is 0 Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:41   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 09/11] ublk: zc register/unregister bvec Keith Busch
2025-02-25 11:00   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 16:35     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 22:56       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 16:19   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 16:27     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 16:42       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 16:52         ` Keith Busch
2025-02-27  4:16           ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 21:14   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-26  8:15   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-26 17:10     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-27  4:19       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 10/11] io_uring: add abstraction for buf_table rsrc data Keith Busch
2025-02-25 16:04   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 11/11] io_uring: cache nodes and mapped buffers Keith Busch
2025-02-25 13:11   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:10 ` [PATCHv5 00/11] ublk zero copy support Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:47   ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-25 15:07 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADUfDZqmVX6Vn9euU0v9AvYGdU6BPtR7vEDBgss_8Hiv7WHuZw@mail.gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox